Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32015429›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2020

The consequences of craniofacial integration for the adaptive radiations of Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers.

Guillermo Navalón, Jesús Marugán-Lobón, Jen A Bright, Christopher R Cooney, Emily J Rayfield

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Physiology mediates transcontinental radiations of freshwater fishes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spatiotemporal Pattern of a Macrofungal GenusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Beak morphometry and morphogenesis across avian radiations.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Developmental origin underlies evolutionary rate variation across the placental skull.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guillermo NavalónSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. guillermo.navalon@earth.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2447-1275
Jesús Marugán-LobónUnidad de Paleontología, Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jen A BrightDepartment of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Christopher R CooneyDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4872-9146
Emily J RayfieldSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. e.rayfield@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2618-750X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversifications of Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers are two text-book examples of adaptive radiation in birds. Why these two bird groups radiated while the remaining endemic birds in these two archipelagos exhibit relatively low diversity and disparity remains unexplained. Ecological factors have failed to provide a convincing answer to this phenomenon, and some intrinsic causes connected to craniofacial evolution have been hypothesized. The tight coevolution of the beak and the remainder of the skull in diurnal raptors and parrots suggests that integration may be the prevalent condition in landbirds (Inopinaves). This is in contrast with the archetypal relationship between beak shape and ecology in Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers, which suggests that the beak can adapt as a distinct module in these birds. Modularity has therefore been proposed to underpin the adaptive radiation of these groups, allowing the beak to evolve more rapidly and freely in response to ecological opportunity. Here, using geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods in a broad sample of landbird skulls, we show that craniofacial evolution in Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers seems to be characterized by a tighter coevolution of the beak and the rest of the skull (cranial integration) than in most landbird lineages, with rapid and extreme morphological evolution of both skull regions along constrained directions of phenotypic space. These patterns are unique among landbirds, including other sympatric island radiations, and therefore counter previous hypotheses by showing that tighter cranial integration, not only modularity, can facilitate evolution along adaptive directions.

Indexed as

FinchesPasseriformesAnimalsBeakHawaiiPhylogeny

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.