Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32015392›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Resistance to change: AMR gene dynamics on a commercial pig farm with high antimicrobial usage.

Jolinda Pollock, Adrian Muwonge, Michael R Hutchings, Geoffrey Mainda, Barend M Bronsvoort, David L Gally, Alexander Corbishley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of CommensalAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jolinda PollockAnimal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Adrian MuwongeThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-0384
Michael R HutchingsAnimal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Geoffrey MaindaThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Barend M BronsvoortThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3271-8485
David L GallyThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alexander CorbishleyThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. alexander.corbishley@roslin.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7902-0914

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/J004227/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/P007767/1RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/N020162/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group antimicrobial administration is used to control disease in livestock, but we have little insight into how this impacts antimicrobial resistance (AMR) gene dynamics. Here, a longitudinal study was carried out during a single production cycle on a commercial pig unit with high historic and current antimicrobial usage. Quantitative PCR, 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding and shotgun metagenomic sequencing were used to track faecal AMR gene abundance and diversity and microbiome alpha diversity. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing identified 144 AMR genes in total, with higher AMR gene diversity present in young pigs compared to dry sows. Irrespective of in-feed antibiotic treatment or changes in microbiome diversity, mean AMR gene copy number was consistently high, with some AMR genes present at copy numbers comparable to the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. In conclusion, AMR gene prevalence and abundance were not influenced by antibiotic use, either during the production cycle or following whole-herd medication. The high levels of certain genes indicate they are widely disseminated throughout the microbial population, potentially aiding stability. Despite the high and relatively stable levels of resistance genes against the main antimicrobials used, these compounds continue to control production limiting diseases on this unit.

Indexed as

SwineAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipBacterial InfectionsDrug Resistance, BacterialFarmsFecesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwine DiseasesAnti-Infective AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32015392
PMCPMC6997390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.