ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2020
Muscone reduced the hypnotic and analgesic effect of ketamine in mice.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Comparison of the effects of natural, cultivated, and synthetic musk on preventing acute cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2026Article
- Effects of Natural Product-Derived Compounds on Inflammatory Pain via Regulation of Microglial Activation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Correlation Analysis between Muskrat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Research progress on mechanism of Chinese Kaiqiao herbs in management of neuropathic pain.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2022Review
- Zoology, chemical composition, pharmacology, quality control and future perspective of Musk (Moschus): a review.Chinese medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the effects of different concentrations of muscone on the ketamine requirement for hypnosis and analgesia and possible mechanism in mice.
methodsIn the hypnotic response experiment, muscone (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 mg/kg) was administered 15 minutes before ketamine by intraperitoneal injection. The hypnotic response was evaluated by loss of righting reflex (LORR). In the analgesia experiment, muscone (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg/kg) was administered 15 minutes before 50 mg/kg ketamine injection. Pain threshold was assessed by measuring the tail-flick latency induced by heat radiation. Twenty minutes after ketamine injection, the mRNA expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NR) subunits, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors subunits, opioid receptors subunits, and some Na and Ca channels were detected by qPCR in the hippocampus of mice.
resultsThe 50% effective dose (ED50) with 95% confidence interval of ketamine-induced LORR was 49.2 (43.4-56.4) mg/kg. About 4.0 or 8.0 mg/kg muscone increased ED50 of ketamine-induced hypnosis, which was 82.7 (70.0-98.4) mg/kg or 72.0 (65.4-85.7) mg/kg, respectively. In the analgesic experiment, ketamine alone caused an obvious analgesic effect, whereas different dose of muscone decreased pain threshold in the presence of ketamine; 4.0 mg/kg muscone up-regulated the mRNA expression of NR1 and inhibited ketamine-induced increase of δ-opioid receptor mRNA level. Muscone also inhibited Cav2.1 mRNA expression in the presence of ketamine.
conclusionMuscone reduced the hypnotic and analgesic effect of ketamine in dose-independent manner in mice, which may be related to the changes of NR1 and δ-opioid receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.