Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32015225›Full record

ArticleBiofabrication2020

Handheld instrument for wound-conformal delivery of skin precursor sheets improves healing in full-thickness burns.

Richard Y Cheng, Gertraud Eylert, Jean-Michel Gariepy, Sijin He, Hasan Ahmad, Yizhou Gao, Stefania Priore, Navid Hakimi, Marc G Jeschke, Axel Günther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biofabrication, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Fundamental research · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. 3D Printing-Based Hydrogel Dressings for Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  12. An Adhesive Bioink toward Biofabrication under Wet Conditions.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  13. A novel portableAPL bioengineering · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Bioactive materials · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Bioinspired skin towards next-generation rehabilitation medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard Y ChengInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.
Gertraud EylertInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Room 2374, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Jean-Michel GariepyDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S3G8, Canada.
Sijin HeDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S3G8, Canada.
Hasan AhmadDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S3G8, Canada.
Yizhou GaoDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S3G8, Canada.
Stefania PrioreRoss Tilley Burn Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Ave, Room D704, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Navid HakimiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S3G8, Canada.
Marc G JeschkeInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Room 2374, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Axel GüntherInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 164 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0592-2261

Funding

Hepatic ER stress contributes to morbidity and mortality after burn injury.R01GM087285 · NIGMS · SUNNYBROOK & WOMEN'S COLL HLTH SCIS CTR · PI BOEHNING, DARREN F, JESCHKE, MARC GERHARD · 2010 to 2018
$1.9M
CIHR 123336NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current standard of care for patients with severe large-area burns consists of autologous skin grafting or acellular dermal substitutes. While emerging options to accelerate wound healing involve treatment with allogeneic or autologous cells, delivering cells to clinically relevant wound topologies, orientations, and sizes remains a challenge. Here, we report the one-step in situ formation of cell-containing biomaterial sheets using a handheld instrument that accommodates the topography of the wound. In an approach that maintained cell viability and proliferation, we demonstrated conformal delivery to surfaces that were inclined up to 45° with respect to the horizontal. In porcine pre-clinical models of full-thickness burn, we delivered mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-containing fibrin sheets directly to the wound bed, improving re-epithelialization, dermal cell repopulation, and neovascularization, indicating that this device could be introduced in a clinical setting improving dermal and epidermal regeneration.

Indexed as

Skin, ArtificialAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBurnsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationFibrinHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsSkinSkin TransplantationSwineWound HealingBiocompatible MaterialsFibrin

Identifiers

PMID32015225
PMCPMC7042907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.