ArticleJournal of bacteriology2020
Comparative Genomic Analysis of Closely Related
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025Article
- Transcriptomics ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Comparison of mucosa-associated microbiota in Crohn's disease patients with and without anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2022Article
- Comprehensive deciphering prophages in genusFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Proteolytic Processing, Maturation, and Unique Synteny of theMicrobiology spectrum · 2021Article
- Impacts of type II toxin-antitoxin systems on cell physiology and environmental behavior in acetic acid bacteria.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Comparative Genomic and Secretomic Analysis Provide Insights Into Unique Agar Degradation Function of Marine BacteriumFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.