Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32015108›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Shale gas development has limited effects on stream biology and geochemistry in a gradient-based, multiparameter study in Pennsylvania.

Adam C Mumford, Kelly O Maloney, Denise M Akob, Sarah Nettemann, Arianne Proctor, Jason Ditty, Luke Ulsamer, Josh Lookenbill, Isabelle M Cozzarelli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam C MumfordWater Mission Area, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192; amumford@usgs.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-8082-8910
Kelly O MaloneyLeetown Science Center, US Geological Survey, Kearneysville, WV 25430.ORCID 0000-0003-2304-0745
Denise M AkobWater Mission Area, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192.ORCID 0000-0003-1534-3025
Sarah NettemannApplied Geology, Institute of Geosciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Burgweg 11, 07749 Jena, Germany.
Arianne ProctorBureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg, PA 17101.
Jason DittyBureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg, PA 17101.
Luke UlsamerBureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg, PA 17101.
Josh LookenbillDivision of Water Quality, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Harrisburg, PA 17101.
Isabelle M CozzarelliWater Mission Area, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192.ORCID 0000-0002-5123-1007
United States Geological Survey · USPennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources · USFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEPennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of horizontally drilled shale oil and gas wells in the United States has increased from nearly 28,000 in 2007 to nearly 127,000 in 2017, and research has suggested the potential for the development of shale resources to affect nearby stream ecosystems. However, the ability to generalize current studies is limited by the small geographic scope as well as limited breadth and integration of measured chemical and biological indicators parameters. This study tested the hypothesis that a quantifiable, significant relationship exists between the density of oil and gas (OG) development, increasing stream water concentrations of known geochemical tracers of OG extraction, and the composition of benthic macroinvertebrate and microbial communities. Twenty-five headwater streams that drain lands across a gradient of shale gas development intensity were sampled. Our strategy included comprehensive measurements across multiple seasons of sampling to account for temporal variability of geochemical parameters, including known shale OG geochemical tracers, and microbial and benthic macroinvertebrate communities. No significant relationships were found between the intensity of OG development, shale OG geochemical tracers, or benthic macroinvertebrate or microbial community composition, whereas significant seasonal differences in stream chemistry were observed. These results highlight the importance of considering spatial and temporal variability in stream chemistry and biota and not only the presence of anthropogenic activities in a watershed. This comprehensive, integrated study of geochemical and biological variability of headwater streams in watersheds undergoing OG development provides a robust framework for examining the effects of energy development at a regional scale.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsBacteriaEnvironmental MonitoringInvertebratesOil and Gas FieldsPennsylvaniaRivershydraulic fracturingmacroinvertebratesMarcellus Shalemicrobiologywater quality

Identifiers

PMID32015108
PMCPMC7035526
OpenAlexW3005053326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.