Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32014880›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Charbel El-Kefraoui, Ghadeer Olleik, Marc-Aurele Chay, Araz Kouyoumdjian, Philip Nguyen-Powanda, Fateme Rajabiyazdi, Uyen Do, Alexa Derksen, Tara Landry, Alexandre Amar-Zifkin and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07775248 (Novel Extended-Release Bupivacaine Polymer for Sustained Pain Relief Following Total Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07775248 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Novel Extended-Release Bupivacaine Polymer for Sustained Pain Relief Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry Ford Health SystemRan2025 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsOsteoarthritis (OA) of the KneeArmsPeriarticular Injection, Adductor Canal Block, Bupivacaine-Meloxicam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charbel El-KefraouiSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ghadeer OlleikSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marc-Aurele ChayFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Araz KouyoumdjianSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Philip Nguyen-PowandaDivision of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Fateme RajabiyazdiSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Uyen DoSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Alexa DerksenChild Health and Human Development Program, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Tara LandryBibliothèque de la Santé, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Alexandre Amar-ZifkinMedical Libraries, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Agnihotram V RamanakumarDepartment of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marc-Olivier MartelDentistry and Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Gabriele BaldiniDepartment of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Liane FeldmanSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Julio F FioreSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada julio.fiorejunior@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0019-8673
McGill University Health Centre · CAMcGill University · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExcessive prescribing after surgery has contributed to a public health crisis of opioid addiction and overdose in North America. However, the value of prescribing opioids to manage postoperative pain after surgical discharge remains unclear. We propose a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the extent to which opioid analgesia impact postoperative pain intensity and adverse events in comparison to opioid-free analgesia in patients discharged after surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Major electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, AMED, BIOSIS, CINAHL and PsycINFO) will be searched for multi-dose randomised-trials examining the comparative effectiveness of opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge. Studies published from January 1990 to July 2019 will be targeted, with no language restrictions. The search will be re-run before manuscript submission to include most recent literature. We will consider studies involving patients undergoing minor and major surgery. Teams of reviewers will, independently and in duplicate, assess eligibility, extract data and evaluate risk of bias. Our main outcomes of interest are pain intensity and postoperative vomiting. Study results will be pooled using random effects models. When trials report outcomes for a common domain (eg, pain intensity) using different scales, we will convert effect sizes to a common standard metric (eg, Visual Analogue Scale). Minimally important clinical differences reported in previous literature will be considered when interpreting results. Subgroup analyses defined a priori will be conducted to explore heterogeneity. Risk of bias will be assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. The quality of evidence for all outcomes will be evaluated using the GRADE rating system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required since this is a systematic review of published studies. Our results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. Further knowledge dissemination will be sought via public and patient organisations focussed on pain and opioid-related harms.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnalgesics, OpioidPain MeasurementPatient DischargePostoperative PainHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAnalgesics, Opioidadult surgerypain managementsurgery

Identifiers

PMID32014880
PMCPMC7045253
OpenAlexW3004303450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.