Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32014815›Full record

ArticleForensic science international2020

Emerging techniques for the detection of pyrotechnic residues from seized postal packages containing fireworks.

Karlijn D B Bezemer, Thomas P Forbes, Annemieke W C Hulsbergen, Jennifer Verkouteren, Shannon T Krauss, Mattijs Koeberg, Peter J Schoenmakers, Greg Gillen, Arian C van Asten

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Applications of DESI and DART Mass Spectrometry in Forensic Science.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Forensic applications of DART-MS: A review of recent literature.Forensic chemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Karlijn D B BezemerUniversity of Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Netherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, the Netherlands. Electronic address: k.bezemer@nfi.nl.
Thomas P ForbesNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Measurement Science Division, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Annemieke W C HulsbergenNetherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Jennifer VerkouterenNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Measurement Science Division, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Shannon T KraussNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Measurement Science Division, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Mattijs KoebergNetherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Peter J SchoenmakersUniversity of Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Greg GillenNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Measurement Science Division, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Arian C van AstenUniversity of Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; CLHC, Amsterdam Center for Forensic Science and Medicine, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, 1090 GD Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLMaterial Measurement Laboratory · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · USNetherlands Forensic Institute · NL

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High volume screening of parcels with the aim to trace the illegal distribution and selling of fireworks using postal services is challenging. Inspection services have limited manpower and means to perform extensive visual inspection. In this study, the presence of solid pyrotechnic residues collected from cardboard shipping parcels containing fireworks was investigated for direct in-field chemical detection. Two emerging trace detection techniques, i.e., capillary electrophoresis (CE)-based inorganic oxidizer detector and infrared thermal desorption (IRTD) coupled with direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS), were investigated for their potential as screening tools. Detection of non-visible pyrotechnic trace residues from real-case seized parcels was demonstrated using both screening techniques. However, the high nitrate background in the commercial CE system complicated its screening for black powder traces. IRTD-DART-MS allowed differentiation between flash and black powder by identification of the molecular inorganic ions. Compared to the portable CE instrument, rapid screening using IRTD-DART-MS is currently limited to laboratory settings. The capabilities of these emerging techniques established solid particle and trace residue chemical detection as interesting options for parcel screening in a logistic setting.

Indexed as

Capillary electrophoresisFireworksForensic explosives analysisIRTD-DART-MSParcel screeningPyrotechnicsTrace-explosive detection

Identifiers

PMID32014815
PMCPMC8041295
OpenAlexW3000756295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.