Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32014084›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2020

Histologic Comparison of the Dura Mater among Species.

Ahmet Kinaci, Wilhelmina Bergmann, Ronald Law Bleys, Albert van der Zwan, Tristan Pc van Doormaal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The meningeal-cerebellar axis: a new perspective on cerebellar development.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
  11. Aquaporins in the Capillaries of the Dura Mater of Pigs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. An investigational time-course study using anAnnals of translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An electrophysiological correlate of sleep in a shark.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmet KinaciDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolph Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Brain Technology Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands;, Email: akinaci@outlook.com.
Wilhelmina BergmannDivision ofPathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ronald Law BleysDepartment of Anatomy, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Albert van der ZwanDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolph Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Brain Technology Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tristan Pc van DoormaalDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolph Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Brain Technology Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biocompatibility, biodegradation, feasibility, and efficacy of medical devices like dural sealants and substitutes are often evaluated in various animal models. However, none of these studies explain the rationale for choosing a particular species, and a systematic interspecies comparison of the dura is not available. We hypothesized that histologic characteristics of the dura would differ among species. We systematically investigated basic characteristics of the dura, including thickness, composition, and fibroblast orientation of the dura mater, in 34 samples representing 10 animal species and compared these features with human dura by using hematoxylin and eosin staining and light microscopy. Dura showed many similarities between species in terms of composition. In all species, dura consisted of at least one fibrovascular layer, which contained collagen, fibroblasts, and blood vessels, and a dural border cell layer beneath the fibrovascular layer. Differences between species included the number of fibrovascular layers, fibroblast orientation, and dural thickness. Human dura was the thickest (564 μm) followed by equine (313 μm), bovine (311 μm), and porcine (304 μm) dura. Given the results of this study and factors such as gross anatomy, feasibility, housing, and ethical considerations, we recommend the use of a porcine model for dural research, especially for in vivo studies.

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryAnatomy, ComparativeAnimalsDura MaterFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID32014084
PMCPMC7137549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.