Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32013997›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Using routine referral data for patients with knee and hip pain to improve access to specialist care.

Kate Button, Irena Spasić, Rebecca Playle, David Owen, Mandy Lau, Liam Hannaway, Stephen Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kate ButtonSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Eastgate House, Newport Road, Cardiff, CF24 0AB, UK. buttonk@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-9901
Irena SpasićSchool of Computer Science & Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Rebecca PlayleCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
David OwenSchool of Computer Science & Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Mandy LauCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Liam HannawayBrynderwen Surgery, St Mellons, Cardiff, UK.
Stephen JonesTrauma and Orthopaedics, Cardiff and Vale Orthopaedic Centre, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff and Vale UHB, Cardiff, UK.

Funding

Health and Care Research Wales 1114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReferral letters from primary care contain a large amount of information that could be used to improve the appropriateness of the referral pathway for individuals seeking specialist opinion for knee or hip pain. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the content of the referral letters to identify information that can independently predict an optimal care pathway.

methodsUsing a prospective longitudinal design, a convenience sample of patients with hip or knee pain were recruited from orthopaedic, specialist general practice and advanced physiotherapy practitioner clinics. Individuals completed a Knee or hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score at initial consultation and after 6 months. Participant demographics, body mass index, medication and co-morbidity data were extracted from the referral letters. Free text of the referral letters was mapped automatically onto the Unified Medical Language System to identify relevant clinical variables. Treatment outcomes were extracted from the consultation letters. Each outcome was classified as being an optimal or sub-optimal pathway, where an optimal pathway was defined as the one that results in the right treatment at the right time. Logistic regression was used to identify variables that were independently associated with an optimal pathway.

resultsA total of 643 participants were recruited, 419 (66.7%) were classified as having an optimal pathway. Variables independently associated with having an optimal care pathway were lower body mass index (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.0 p = 0.004), named disease or syndromes (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.8, p = 0.02) and taking pharmacologic substances (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.3, p = 0.02). Having a single diagnostic procedure was associated with a suboptimal pathway (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.9 p < 0.001). Neither Knee nor Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome scores were associated with an optimal pathway. Body mass index was found to be a good predictor of patient rated function (coefficient - 0.8, 95% CI -1.1, - 0.4 p < 0.001).

conclusionOver 30% of patients followed sub-optimal care pathway, which represents potential inefficiency and wasted healthcare resource. A core data set including body mass index should be considered as this was a predictor of optimal care and patient rated pain and function.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthralgiaBody Mass IndexCritical PathwaysDatasets as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGeneral PractitionersHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneeCare pathwayHipKneeMusculoskeletalText mining

Identifiers

PMID32013997
PMCPMC6998102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.