Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32013927›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

IL-36 s in the colorectal cancer: is interleukin 36 good or bad for the development of colorectal cancer?

Feier Chen, Meng Qu, Feng Zhang, Zhenyu Tan, Qinghua Xia, Brett D Hambly, Shisan Bao, Kun Tao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical implications of interleukins-31, 32, and 33 in gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. IL-36 in chronic inflammation and fibrosis - bridging the gap?The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Feier ChenDepartment of Pathology, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Meng QuBeihua University School of Medicine, Jilin, China.
Feng ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhenyu TanDepartment of Pathology, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qinghua XiaCentre for Disease Control and Prevention of Changning District, Shanghai, China.
Brett D HamblyDepartment of Pathology, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shisan BaoDepartment of Pathology, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. bob.bao@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6687-3846
Kun TaoDepartment of Pathology, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. taokun@shtrhospital.com.
The University of Sydney · AUTongren Hospital · CNBeihua University · CNShanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CN

Funding

Shanghai Jiaotong University Medical Professional Cross Fund and the Joint Research Initiative grant from Shanghai Jiaotong University, China nilUniversity of Sydney 2019 round The SJTU Research grants
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsColorectal cancer (CRC) is a major killer. Host immunity is important in tumorigenesis. Direct comparison among IL-36α, IL-36β and IL-36γ in the prognosis of CRC is unclear.

methodsCRC tissue arrays were generated from colorectostomy samples with TNM stage, invasion depth and the demography of these patients (n = 185). Using immunohistochemistry/histopathology, IL-36α, IL-36β and IL-36γ were determined, in comparison to non-cancer tissues.

resultsA significant association was observed between colonic IL-36α, IL-36β or IL-36γ and the presence of cancer (with all P < 0.0001). Using ROC curve analysis, specificity and sensitivity of IL-36α, IL-36β or IL-36γ were confirmed, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.68, 0.73 and 0.65, respectively. Significant differences in survival were observed between IL-36α

conclusionIL-36α or IL-36γ are reliable biomarkers in predicting the prognosis of CRC during the later or early stages of the disease, respectively. Combining IL-36α plus IL-36γ appears to more accurately predict the postoperative prognosis of CRC patients. Our data may be useful in the management of CRC.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansInterleukin-1Lymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSurvival AnalysisTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorIL36A protein, humanIL36B protein, humanIL36G protein, humanInterleukin-1Colorectal cancerIL36Multivariate analysisPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID32013927
PMCPMC6998229
OpenAlexW3010461810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.