ArticleBMC cancer2020
Correction to: The relative risk of second primary cancers in Switzerland: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risks of colorectal and extracolonic cancers following colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Incidence Patterns and Prognostic Impact of Lung-Involving Multiple Primary Cancers: A 10-Year Hospital-Based Cohort Study.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- A pancancer analysis of the clinical and genomic characteristics of multiple primary cancers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Triple Primary Malignancies: Tumor Associations, Survival, and Clinicopathological Analysis: A 25-Year Single-Institution Experience.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following publication of the original article [1], an error was reported in the author group. The correct author group should read as follows.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.