ArticleBMC anesthesiology2020
Effect of sex differences in remifentanil requirements for inhibiting the response to a CO
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimation of EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Remifentanil requirement for i-gel insertion is reduced in male patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing deep brain stimulator implantation: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Trial
- Type of anesthesia and quality of recovery in male patients undergoing lumbar surgery: a randomized trial comparing propofol-remifentanil total i.v. anesthesia with sevoflurane anesthesia.BMC anesthesiology · 2021Trial
- Minimum Alveolar Concentration-Awake of Sevoflurane is Decreased in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: An Up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial.Clinical interventions in aging · 2021Trial
- The influence of sex on the dosage of remimazolam co-administered with remifentanil for loss of consciousness in adult patients: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
- ECDrug design, development and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA CO
methodsThe current study is an up-and-down sequential allocation trial. Forty-six patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, a body mass index 18 to 30 kg/m
resultsPatients characteristics including age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, type of surgery and surgery duration, were comparable between male and female patients. The EC
conclusionsThe EC
trial registrationThe study was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR-IOR-17011906, 8th, July, 2017).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.