ArticleBMC genomics2020
Comparative analysis of Lactobacillus gasseri from Chinese subjects reveals a new species-level taxa.
Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the probiotic potential of a healthy human vaginal flora, Lactobacillus gasseri K9: genomic and in vitro aspects.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Bacteriocins as precision antimicrobials: genomic exploration and oral applications of Lactobacillus peptides.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 22: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2025.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- The curated Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM genome provides insights into strain specificity and microevolution.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Population genomics of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei: pan-genome, integrated prophage, antibiotic resistance, and carbohydrate utilization.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Draft genome sequence and probiotic functional property analysis of Lactobacillus gasseri LM1065 for food industry applications.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Distribution of Genes Related to Probiotic Effects Across Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus Revealed by Population Structure.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2023Article
- Acetate modulates the inhibitory effect ofMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2023Article
- Bioinformatics and its role in the study of the evolution and probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria.Food science and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Commensal Lactobacilli Metabolically Contribute to Cervical Epithelial Homeostasis in a Species-Specific Manner.mSphere · 2023Article
- Application of 16S rRNA virtual RFLP for the discrimination of some closely taxonomic-related lactobacilli species.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2022Article
- In-depth insights into cervicovaginal microbial communities and hrHPV infections using high-resolution microbiome profiling.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2022Article
- Lactobacilli and human dental caries: more than mechanical retention.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2022Article
- Characterization of CRISPR-Cas systems inMicrobial genomics · 2022Article
- Article
- Genomic insights intoPeerJ · 2022Article
- Differential Effect of Vaginal Microbiota on Spontaneous Preterm Birth among Chinese Pregnant Women.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Tetracycline Resistance and Determination of the Tentative Microbiological Cutoff Values in Lactic Acid Bacterial Species.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Comparative Genomics and Specific Functional Characteristics Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- The fate of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in soilless agriculture: future perspectives.3 Biotech · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLactobacillus gasseri as a probiotic has history of safe consumption is prevalent in infants and adults gut microbiota to maintain gut homeostasis.
resultsIn this study, to explore the genomic diversity and mine potential probiotic characteristics of L. gasseri, 92 strains of L. gasseri were isolated from Chinese human feces and identified based on 16 s rDNA sequencing, after draft genomes sequencing, further average nucleotide identity (ANI) value and phylogenetic analysis reclassified them as L. paragasseri (n = 79) and L. gasseri (n = 13), respectively. Their pan/core-genomes were determined, revealing that L. paragasseri had an open pan-genome. Comparative analysis was carried out to identify genetic features, and the results indicated that 39 strains of L. paragasseri harboured Type II-A CRISPR-Cas system while 12 strains of L. gasseri contained Type I-E and II-A CRISPR-Cas systems. Bacteriocin operons and the number of carbohydrate-active enzymes were significantly different between the two species.
conclusionsThis is the first time to study pan/core-genome of L. gasseri and L. paragasseri, and compare their genetic diversity, and all the results provided better understating on genetics of the two species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.