ArticleRadiology2020
Assessment of Hepatic Steatosis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease by Using Quantitative US.
Article in Radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07667647 (Healthy Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Microvasculature and Placental Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Healthy Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Microvasculature and Placental Imaging
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-derived fat fraction for diagnosing hepatic steatosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- A Systematized Review of Quantitative Ultrasound Based on First-Order Speckle Statistics.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of ultrasound-derived fat fraction for grading hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic liver diseases: a multicenter study.European radiology · 2026Article
- MRI in MASLD: technical foundations and guideline-based applications.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Review
- A precision-constrained framework for evaluating noninvasive biomarkers in MASLD and beyond.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Ultrasound structure function for quantitative assessment of steatotic liver disease based on total severity score.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Steatosis index: a novel multiparametric ultrasound approach for accurate liver steatosis quantification and grading.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-based fat fraction for detection of hepatic steatosis and quantification of liver fat content using liver biopsy as the reference standard.European radiology · 2026Article
- Clinical assessment of hepatic steatosis and iron content using three-dimensional (3D) multi-echo chemical shift encoded magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): correlation with histopathology.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Thermoacoustic Ultrasound Assessment of Liver Steatosis-A Novel Approach for MASLD Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Robust domain selection for functional data via interval-wise testing and effect size mapping.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2026Article
- Imaging Evaluation for Steatotic Liver Disease.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Evaluation methods of hepatic steatosis: From conventional techniques to emerging biomarkers.World journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- UltraWave: An Open-source Multi-GPU Full-wave Simulator for Acoustic and Elastic Wave Scattering in 3-D Heterogeneous Media.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in ultrasound: divergent pathways, shared challenges.BJR artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- MR and Ultrasound for Liver Fat Assessment in Children: Techniques and Supporting Evidence.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Characterization of Placental Tissue Microstructure in a Rat Model of Preeclampsia.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
- First-Order Speckle Statistics for the Detection of Microstructural Anisotropy.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025Article
- Comparing ultrasound-derived fat fraction and MRI-PDFF for quantifying hepatic steatosis: a real-world prospective study.European radiology · 2025Article
- Quantitative Liver Fat Assessment by Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Technical Implementation and Pilot Study in Adults.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background Advanced confounder-corrected chemical shift-encoded MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) is a leading parameter for fat fraction quantification in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Because of the limited availability of this MRI technique, there is a need to develop and validate alternative parameters to assess liver fat. Purpose To assess relationship of quantitative US parameters to MRI PDFF and to develop multivariable quantitative US models to detect hepatic steatosis and quantify hepatic fat. Materials and Methods Adults with known NAFLD or who were suspected of having NAFLD were prospectively recruited between August 2015 and February 2019. Participants underwent quantitative US and chemical shift-encoded MRI liver examinations. Liver biopsies were performed if clinically indicated. The correlation between seven quantitative US parameters and MRI PDFF was evaluated. By using leave-one-out cross validation, two quantitative US multivariable models were evaluated: a classifier to differentiate participants with NAFLD versus participants without NAFLD and a fat fraction estimator. Classifier performance was summarized by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the precision-recall curve. Fat fraction estimator performance was evaluated by correlation, linearity, and bias. Results Included were 102 participants (mean age, 52 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 53 women), 78 with NAFLD (MRI PDFF ≥ 5%). A two-variable classifier yielded a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.82, 0.96) and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.93, 0.99). The cross-validated fat fraction predicted by a two-variable fat fraction estimator was correlated with MRI PDFF (Spearman ρ = 0.82 [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.