ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2020
Neural Mechanisms of Strategic Adaptation in Attentional Flexibility.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Domain-specific cognitive flexibility: Shift-readiness adaptations for task- and attention-switching are non-transferrable.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Article
- Serial processing of stimulus identity and shift readiness predictions.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Learned saccade readiness varies with fluctuations in sustained attention.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Category-like representation of statistical regularities allows for stable distractor suppression.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Trichotomy revisited: A monolithic theory of attentional control.Vision research · 2024Article
- Learning Cognitive Flexibility: Neural Substrates of Adapting Switch-Readiness to Time-varying Demands.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Resilience as the Ability to Maintain Well-Being: An Allostatic Active Inference Model.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Review
- The location independence of learned attentional flexibility.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Analogous computations in working memory input, output and motor gating: Electrophysiological and computational modeling evidence.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2020
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals are able to adjust their readiness to shift spatial attention, referred to as "attentional flexibility," according to the changing demands of the environment, but the neural mechanisms underlying learned adjustments in flexibility are unknown. In the current study, we used fMRI to identify the brain structures responsible for learning shift likelihood. Participants were cued to covertly hold or shift attention among continuous streams of alphanumeric characters and to indicate the parity of target stimuli. Unbeknown to the participants, the stream locations were predictive of the likelihood of having to shift (or hold) attention. Participants adapted their attentional flexibility according to contextual demands, such that the RT cost associated with shifting attention was smallest when shift cues were most likely. Learning model-derived shift prediction error scaled positively with activity within dorsal and ventral frontoparietal regions, documenting that these regions track and update shift likelihood. A complementary inverted encoding model analysis revealed that the pretrial difference in attentional selection strength between to-be-attended and to-be-ignored locations did not change with increasing shift likelihood. The behavioral improvement associated with learned flexibility may primarily arise from a speeding of the shift process rather than from preparatory broadening of attentional selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.