Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32013267›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Ocular Involvement in Friedreich Ataxia Patients and its Relationship with Neurological Disability, a Follow-up Study.

Pilar Rojas, Ana I Ramírez, Rosa de Hoz, Manuel Cadena, Antonio Ferreras, Blanca Monsalve, Elena Salobrar-García, José L Muñoz-Blanco, José L Urcelay-Segura, Juan J Salazar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Syndromic Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Narrative Review.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An Eye on Movement Disorders.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2021
    Review
  9. Neuro-Ophthalmological Findings in Friedreich's Ataxia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pilar RojasHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto Oftálmico de Madrid, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Ana I RamírezInstituto de Investigaciones Oftalmológicas Ramón Castroviejo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Rosa de HozInstituto de Investigaciones Oftalmológicas Ramón Castroviejo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Manuel CadenaHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto Oftálmico de Madrid, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Antonio FerrerasHospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Blanca MonsalveHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto Oftálmico de Madrid, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Elena Salobrar-GarcíaInstituto de Investigaciones Oftalmológicas Ramón Castroviejo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
José L Muñoz-BlancoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Unidad ALS-Neuromuscular, Departamento de Neurología, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
José L Urcelay-SeguraHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto Oftálmico de Madrid, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Juan J SalazarInstituto de Investigaciones Oftalmológicas Ramón Castroviejo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
José M RamírezInstituto de Investigaciones Oftalmológicas Ramón Castroviejo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsEight FRDA Spanish patients and eight HC were selected from 2014 to 2018. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field (VF), optic coherence tomography (OCT), and neurological disability measured by "scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia" (SARA) were taken in a basal exploration and repeated after 6 months. A linear mixed analysis and Bonferroni

resultsFRDA baseline and follow-up patients showed statistically significant decreases in BCVA, VF, and OCT parameters compared with the HC. Some of the VF measurements and most of the OCT parameters had an inverse mild-to-strong correlation with SARA. Moreover, the analysis of the ROC curve demonstrated that the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) average thickness was the best parameter to discriminate between FRDA patients and HC.

conclusionsThe follow-up study showed a progression in OCT parameters. Findings showed a sequential effect in pRNFL, ganglion cell complex (GCC), and macula. The VF and the OCT could be useful biomarkers in FRDA, both for their correlation with neurological disease as well as for their ability to evaluate disease progression.

Indexed as

FRDAFriedreich ataxianeurodegenerationneurological disabilityOCTSARAvisual field

Identifiers

PMID32013267
PMCPMC7168917
OpenAlexW3003453237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.