ArticleMicromachines2020
Centrifugal Microfluidics Traps for Parallel Isolation and Imaging of Single Cells.
Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital Microfluidics for Single Bacteria Capture and Selective Retrieval Using Optical Tweezers.Micromachines · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis at the single cell level has becoming an increasingly important procedure to diagnose cancer tissue biopsies. These tissue samples are often heterogeneous and consist of 1000-15,000 cells. We study the use of centrifugal microfluidics to isolate single cells into micro chambers. We describe the optimization of our microfluidics flow device, characterize its performance using both polystyrene beads as a cell analogue and MCF-7 breast cancer cells, and discuss potential applications for the device. Our results show rapid isolation of ~2000 single cell aliquots in ~20 min. We were able to occupy 65% of available chambers with singly occupied cancer cells, and observed capture efficiencies as high as 80% using input samples ranging from 2000 to 15,000 cells in 20 min. We believe our device is a valuable research tool that addresses the unmet need for massively parallel single cell level analysis of cell populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.