Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32013129›Full record

ReviewNutrients2020

The Unfinished Agenda for Food Fortification in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Quantifying Progress, Gaps and Potential Opportunities.

Penjani Mkambula, Mduduzi N N Mbuya, Laura A Rowe, Mawuli Sablah, Valerie M Friesen, Manpreet Chadha, Akoto K Osei, Corinne Ringholz, Florencia C Vasta, Jonathan Gorstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Penjani MkambulaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Rue de Varembé 7, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Mduduzi N N MbuyaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Rue de Varembé 7, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Laura A RoweFood Fortification Initiative, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Mawuli SablahUNICEF, 3 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA.
Valerie M FriesenGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Rue de Varembé 7, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Manpreet ChadhaNutrition International 180 Elgin St., Suite 1000, Ottawa, ON K2P 2K3, Canada.
Akoto K OseiHelen Keller International, Regional Office for Africa, BP 29.898, Dakar, Senegal.
Corinne RingholzWorld Food Programme, Via Cesare Giulio Viola, 68, 00148, Rome, Italy.
Florencia C VastaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Rue de Varembé 7, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Jonathan GorsteinIodine Global Network, Seattle, WA 98107, USA.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation INV-002077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale food fortification (LSFF) is a cost-effective intervention that is widely implemented, but there is scope to further increase its potential. To identify gaps and opportunities, we first accessed the Global Fortification Data Exchange (GFDx) to identify countries that could benefit from new fortification programs. Second, we aggregated Fortification Assessment Coverage Toolkit (FACT) survey data from 16 countries to ascertain LSFF coverage and gaps therein. Third, we extended our narrative review to assess current innovations. We identified 84 countries as good candidates for new LSFF programs. FACT data revealed that the potential of oil/ghee and salt fortification is not being met due mainly to low coverage of adequately fortified foods (quality). Wheat, rice and maize flour fortification have similar quality issues combined with lower coverage of the fortifiable food at population-level (< 50%). A four-pronged strategy is needed to meet the unfinished agenda: first, establish new LSFF programs where warranted; second, systems innovations informed by implementation research to address coverage and quality gaps; third, advocacy to form new partnerships and resources, particularly with the private sector; and finally, exploration of new fortificants and vehicles (e.g. bouillon cubes; salt fortified with multiple nutrients) and other innovations that can address existing challenges.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesFood, FortifiedNutrition PolicyDietHumansNutritional Statusfortificationlarge- scale food fortificationlow- and middle-income countriesmicronutrient deficiencymicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID32013129
PMCPMC7071326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.