Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012977›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine Analgesia Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-Thoracotomy Pain: A Cost-Effectiveness Study and A Feasibility For Its Future Implementation.

Nemanja Rancic, Katarina Mladenovic, Nela V Ilic, Viktorija Dragojevic-Simic, Menelaos Karanikolas, Tihomir V Ilic, Dusica M Stamenkovic

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nemanja RancicMedical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Katarina MladenovicMedical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Nela V IlicMedical Faculty, University of Belgrade, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Viktorija Dragojevic-SimicMedical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Menelaos KaranikolasDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA menelaos.karanikolas@wustl.edu.
Tihomir V IlicMedical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Dusica M StamenkovicMedical Faculty Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Military Medical Academy · RSUniversity of Belgrade · RSWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective randomized study aims to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with patient controlled intravenous morphine analgesia (PCA-IV) as part of multimodal analgesia after thoracotomy. Patients assigned to the active treatment group (a-tDCS,

Indexed as

Analgesia, Patient-ControlledTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAnalgesics, OpioidCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesHumansMorphinePain MeasurementPostoperative PainProspective StudiesThoracotomyAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineacute paincost and cost analysismorphinepain, postoperativepharmacoeconomicstranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32012977
PMCPMC7037666
OpenAlexW3003695988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.