Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012966›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the ACTLIFE Exercise Program for Women with Post-menopausal Osteoporosis: Study Protocol.

Laura Bragonzoni, Giuseppe Barone, Francesco Benvenuti, Veronica Canal, Claudio Ripamonti, Sofia Marini, Laura Dallolio

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Osteoporosis and the Potential of Cell-Based Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura BragonzoniDepartment of Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna; Campus Rimini, Corso d'Augusto, 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy.
Giuseppe BaroneDepartment of Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna; Campus Rimini, Corso d'Augusto, 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy.
Francesco BenvenutiDepartment of Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna; Campus Rimini, Corso d'Augusto, 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy.
Veronica CanalUnit of Hygiene, Public Health and Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo, 12, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Claudio RipamontiCenter for Osteoporosis and Bone Metabolic Disease, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via G.C. Pupilli,1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Sofia MariniDepartment of Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna; Campus Rimini, Corso d'Augusto, 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7025-4271
Laura DallolioUnit of Hygiene, Public Health and Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo, 12, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7555-9659
Ospedale Infermi di Rimini · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic disease of the skeleton characterized by increased risk of fracture. There is a general consensus on the efficacy of physical activity in the prevention of bone loss, falls and fractures, but there is no agreement on the best setting to exercise. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of a 12-months exercise protocol for women with post-menopausal OP when administered as individual home training (IHT) versus gym group training (GGT). The study is a randomized trial with two parallel groups. Sedentary patients with primary post-menopausal osteoporosis are recruited at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli of Bologna. In the first group, the 12-month ACTLIFE program is performed as IHT, while in the second as GGT. The program is aimed at improving joint mobility, muscle force, balance, motor coordination and endurance. The study is single blinded. Patients are assessed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome is the modification of quality of life measured with the Short Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (ECOS-16). The findings of this study will highlight advantages and disadvantages of exercising in the two different settings and provide evidence on how to increase physical activity in osteoporotic women.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurveys and Questionnairesexercisegym traininghome trainingphysical activitypost-menopausal osteoporosisquality of life

Identifiers

PMID32012966
PMCPMC7036985
OpenAlexW3004354604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.