Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012763›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Validation, Reliability, and Responsiveness Outcomes Of Kinematic Assessment With An RGB-D Camera To Analyze Movement In Subacute And Chronic Low Back Pain.

Manuel Trinidad-Fernández, David Beckwée, Antonio Cuesta-Vargas, Manuel González-Sánchez, Francisco-Angel Moreno, Javier González-Jiménez, Erika Joos, Peter Vaes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03293095 (Functional Task Kinematic in Patient With Musculoskeletal Pathology.), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03293095 completednot on this map

Functional Task Kinematic in Patient With Musculoskeletal Pathology.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of MalagaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled50ConditionsMusculoskeletal DiseaseArmsStandard Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manuel Trinidad-FernándezRehabilitation Sciences Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
David BeckwéeRehabilitation Sciences Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Antonio Cuesta-VargasClinimetric Group F-14, Department of Physiotherapy, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University of Malaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Manuel González-SánchezClinimetric Group F-14, Department of Physiotherapy, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University of Malaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Francisco-Angel MorenoMachine Perception and Intelligent Robotics Group (MAPIR), Dept. of System Engineering and Automation, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University of Malaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
Javier González-JiménezMachine Perception and Intelligent Robotics Group (MAPIR), Dept. of System Engineering and Automation, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University of Malaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
Erika JoosPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation Department, UZ Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Peter VaesRehabilitation Sciences Research Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe RGB-D camera is an alternative to asses kinematics in order to obtain objective measurements of functional limitations. The aim of this study is to analyze the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the motion capture depth camera in sub-acute and chronic low back pain patients.

methodsThirty subjects (18-65 years) with non-specific lumbar pain were screened 6 weeks following an episode. RGB-D camera measurements were compared with an inertial measurement unit. Functional tests included climbing stairs, bending, reaching sock, lie-to-sit, sit-to-stand, and timed up-and-go. Subjects performed the maximum number of repetitions during 30 s. Validity was analyzed using Spearman's correlation, reliability of repetitions was calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient and the standard error of measurement, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess the responsiveness.

resultsThe kinematic analysis obtained variable results according to the test. The time variable had good values in the validity and reliability of all tests (r = 0.93-1.00, (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.62-0.93). Regarding kinematics, the best results were obtained in bending test, sock test, and sit-to-stand test (r = 0.53-0.80, ICC = 0.64-0.83, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.55-84).

conclusionFunctional tasks, such as bending, sit-to-stand, reaching, and putting on sock, assessed with the RGB-D camera, revealed acceptable validity, reliability, and responsiveness in the assessment of patients with low back pain (LBP).

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03293095 "Functional Task Kinematic in Musculoskeletal Pathology" September 26, 2017.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaChronic PainDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedMovementPain MeasurementPostureRange of Motion, ArticularVideo Recordingdepth camerafunctional testlow back painmotion capture systemreliabilityresponsivenessvalidation

Identifiers

PMID32012763
PMCPMC7038379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.