Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012749›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Nutrigenetics: Findings from the 2018 Unified Forces Preventive Nutrition Conference (UFPN).

Vered Kaufman-Shriqui, Hagit Salem, Mona Boaz, Ruth Birk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The "Virtual Digital Twins" Concept in Precision Nutrition.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vered Kaufman-ShriquiDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
Hagit SalemDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
Mona BoazDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
Ruth BirkDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-4277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutrigenetics indicates that individual genetic variability results in altered health outcomes necessitating personalized nutrition adaptation. Registered dietitians are recognized as the clinical nutrition experts, but their knowledge and attitudes regarding nutrigenetics has not been delineated.

methodsThis cross sectional online survey was conducted in a convenience sample of 169 national nutrition conference attendees. The survey queried demographics, knowledge, and attitudes towards nutrigenetics and information on training in nutrigenetics.

resultsThe majority of participants were registered dietitians and female, 45% of whom held advanced degrees. Personalized nutrition was perceived by 93.5% of participants as highly important or important; however, 94% of respondents indicated they are not sufficiently knowledgeable in personalized nutrition and only 9.5% had received training in nutrigenetics. The mean nutrigenetics knowledge score was 6.89 ± 1.67 (out of a possible 12). A multivariate regression model of knowledge score identified education as the only independent predictor of this outcome.

conclusionPersonalized nutrition is a rapidly developing field that incorporates genetic data into clinical practice. Dietitians recognize the importance of advanced studies to acquire knowledge in nutrigenetics. Only by acquiring the necessary knowledge can dietitians accurately translate this nutrigenetics into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNutrigenomicsNutritionistsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesdietitianeducationnutrigeneticsnutrigenomicsnutrition survey

Identifiers

PMID32012749
PMCPMC7071140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.