Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012728›Full record

ArticleCells2020

Opposite Macrophage Polarization in Different Subsets of Ovarian Cancer: Observation from a Pilot Study.

Ann Vankerckhoven, Roxanne Wouters, Thomas Mathivet, Jolien Ceusters, Thaïs Baert, Anaïs Van Hoylandt, Holger Gerhardt, Ignace Vergote, An Coosemans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ann VankerckhovenImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Roxanne WoutersImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas MathivetPARCC, HEGP Institute (team 9), INSERM U970, Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France.
Jolien CeustersImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Thaïs BaertImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Anaïs Van HoylandtImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Holger GerhardtVascular Patterning Lab, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Ignace VergoteImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
An CoosemansImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEDélégation Paris 5 · FRKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEOncoinvent (Norway) · NOVIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the innate immune system in ovarian cancer is gaining importance. The relevance of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) is insufficiently understood. In this pilot project, comprising the immunofluorescent staining of 30 biopsies taken from 24 patients with ovarian cancer, we evaluated the presence of total TAM (cluster of differentiation (CD) 68 expression), M1 (major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II expression), and M2 (anti-mannose receptor C type 1 (MRC1) expression), and the blood vessel diameter. We observed a high M1/M2 ratio in low-grade ovarian cancer compared to high-grade tumors, more total TAM and M2 in metastatic biopsies, and a further increase in total TAM and M2 at interval debulking, without beneficial effects of bevacizumab. The blood vessel diameter was indicative for M2 tumor infiltration (Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.65). These data mainly reveal an immune beneficial environment in low-grade ovarian cancer in contrast to high-grade serous ovarian cancer, where immune suppression is not altered by neoadjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabBiopsyBlood VesselsFemaleGlucose Transporter Type 1HumansMacrophagesMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingOvarian NeoplasmsPilot ProjectsAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabGlucose Transporter Type 1M2macrophagesovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID32012728
PMCPMC7072171
OpenAlexW3001066245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.