Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012674›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Methodological Quality of Manuscripts Reporting on the Usability of Mobile Applications for Pain Assessment and Management: A Systematic Review.

Ana F Almeida, Nelson P Rocha, Anabela G Silva

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Special Issue on E-Health Services.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana F AlmeidaInstitute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA), Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro 3810-193, Portugal.
Nelson P RochaInstitute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA), Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro 3810-193, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3801-7249
Anabela G SilvaSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade de Aveiro-Edifício 30, Agras do Crasto-Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro 3810-193, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4386-5851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been increasing use of mobile mHealth applications, including pain assessment and pain self-management apps. The usability of mHealth applications has vital importance as it affects the quality of apps. Thus, usability assessment with methodological rigor is essential to minimize errors and undesirable consequences, as well as to increase user acceptance.

objectivethis study aimed to synthesize and evaluate existing studies on the assessment of the usability of pain-related apps using a newly developed scale.

methodsan electronic search was conducted in several databases, combining relevant keywords. Then titles and abstracts were screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria. The eligible studies were retrieved and independently screened for inclusion by two authors. Disagreements were resolved by discussion until consensus was reached.

resultsa total of 31 articles were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment revealed that most manuscripts did not assess usability using valid instruments or triangulation of methods of usability assessment. Most manuscripts also failed to assess the three domains of usability (effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction).

conclusionsfuture studies should consider existing guidelines on usability assessment design, development and assessment of pain-related apps.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPain MeasurementSelf-ManagementTelemedicineHumansUser-Computer Interfaceappapplicationmobile appmobile applicationpainusability

Identifiers

PMID32012674
PMCPMC7038093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.