ArticleESC heart failure2020
Early and long-term outcomes of decompensated heart failure patients in a tertiary-care centre in India.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term mortality in heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2022Pooled it
- One-year mortality and re-admission rate by disease etiology in National Heart Failure Registry of India.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Risk factors of readmission and the impact of outpatient management in heart failure patients: A national study in Japan.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Different heart failure phenotypes of valvular heart disease: the role of mitochondrial dysfunction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- Clinical profile and 90 day outcomes of 10 851 heart failure patients across India: National Heart Failure Registry.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Five-year mortality and readmission rates in patients with heart failure in India: Results from the Trivandrum heart failure registry.International journal of cardiology · 2021Article
- Early and long-term outcomes of decompensated heart failure patients in a tertiary-care centre in India.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimLong-term outcome data of acute decompensated heart failure (HF) are scarce from India. The aim of the study was to collect in-hospital and long-term outcome data of HF patients admitted during 2001-2010 in a tertiary-care centre in South India. METHODS AND
resultsConsecutive patients admitted with first episode of decompensated HF were part of the registry. Data regarding diagnosis, risk factors, treatment, early (in-hospital), and late (5 and 10year) mortality outcomes were captured. During this period, 1502 patients were admitted with first episode of decompensated HF [37.7% of women, mean age of 51.1 (SD = 14.3) years]. Common causes were ischaemic heart disease (36.2%), rheumatic heart disease (34.3%), and cardiomyopathies (9.9%). HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was present in 26.9% of patients, and 33.8% had atrial arrhythmias. Diabetes, hypertension, and renal dysfunction were prevalent in 27.4%, 28.6%, and 37.4%, respectively. Median duration of hospitalization was 6 days (interquartile range: 3-10), and 247 patients (16.4%) died during index admission. The total time at risk was 6248 person years, and 1051 patients died during the study period with a median survival time of 3.7 years. Overall mortality rate was 16.8 per 100 person years (95% CI: 15.8-17.9 per 100 person years). Older age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.14, P = 0.007], anaemia (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.08-1.65, P = 0.007), renal dysfunction (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.20-1.59, P < 0.001), HFpEF (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.52-0.73, P < 0.001 against HFrEF), and the use of guideline-directed therapies (GDT; beta blockers: HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.49-0.66, P < 0.0001; and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker: HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.51-0.69, P < 0.001) were important predictors of mortality. Patients with HF and mid-range EF also benefited from GDT.
conclusionIn our cohort, ischaemic and rheumatic heart diseases were the leading contributors for HF. Anaemia, renal dysfunction, poor ejection fraction, and suboptimal prescriptions of GDT were the main predictors of long-term mortality. Both patients with HFrEF and mid-range EF benefited from GDT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.