Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012482›Full record

ArticleCytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.)2020

Comparative analysis of taxol-derived fluorescent probes to assess microtubule networks in a complex live three-dimensional tissue.

Gregory Logan, Brooke McCartney

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gregory LoganCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-4428-1807
Brooke McCartneyCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Carnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

ACTIN CABLE FORMATION COORDINATED BY APC, FORMINS AND MICROTUBULES IN ANIMAL DEVELOPMENTR01GM120378 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MCCARTNEY, BROOKE M · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila oogenesis is an excellent in vivo model for investigating cytoskeletal dynamics because of the rapid cytoskeletal remodeling that occurs at the end of stage 10; however, there are few robust tools for detecting microtubules in live complex tissues. The recent development of membrane permeable taxol-based fluorescent probes to label microtubules is significant technical progress, but the effectiveness of these probes and the potential stabilizing effects of the taxol derivative have not been well characterized in vivo. Here, we compared three commercially available taxol-derived microtubule labels to determine their efficacy and potential artifacts. We found that all three probes labeled microtubules with differences in permeability, brightness, and signal to noise ratio. Like taxol, however, all of the probes disrupted the F-actin cytoskeleton at higher concentrations. We also found that the efflux pump inhibitor, verapamil, increased the intensity of the label and modestly increased the severity of the F-actin defects. Of the three probes, Tubulin Tracker (ThermoScientific) was the most permeable and was brightest, with the highest signal to noise ratio. Furthermore, washing out the probe after a 30-min incubation significantly reduced the F-actin artifacts without compromising signal brightness.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaFluorescent DyesImaging, Three-DimensionalMicrotubulesPaclitaxelFluorescent DyesPaclitaxelcytoskeletondrosophilaF-actinmicrotubulesoogenesistaxol

Identifiers

PMID32012482
PMCPMC7354890
OpenAlexW3004474368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.