Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012284›Full record

Trial reportJournal of forensic sciences2020

Detection of Inflicted Bruises by Alternate Light: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Katherine N Scafide, Daniel J Sheridan, Nancy R Downing, Matthew J Hayat

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of forensic sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Infrared thermography for detection of blunt-force trauma injuries during animal abuse investigations.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024
    Review
  6. Model Quality in AI-based Bruise Detection: Rethinking IoU and Confidence Thresholds.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Bruise dating using deep learning.Journal of forensic sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Trauma Forensics in Blunt and Sharp Force Injuries.Journal of the West African College of Surgeons
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine N ScafideCollege of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, 22030.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9443-0006
Daniel J SheridanCollege of Nursing, Texas A&M University Health Sciences Center, 8447 Riverside Parkway, Bryan, TX, 77807.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0587-2356
Nancy R DowningCollege of Nursing, Texas A&M University Health Sciences Center, 8447 Riverside Parkway, Bryan, TX, 77807.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4975-3789
Matthew J HayatSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, 140 Decatur Street, Atlanta, GA, 30303.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3252-2255
Texas A&M Health Science Center · USGeorge Mason University · USGeorgia State University · US

Funding

National Institute of Justice 2016-DN-BX-0147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bruises are often difficult to detect on victims of violence, potentially impacting investigation and prosecution. The purpose of our randomized controlled trial was to measure the effectiveness of an alternate light source (ALS) within visible and long ultraviolet spectrums at improving bruise detection compared to white light over time. We also examined the effects of skin color, age, gender, localized fat, and injury mechanism on bruise detection. Participants included 157 healthy adults with balanced sampling across six skin color categories. Bruises were created under the controlled application of a paintball pellet and dropped weight to one upper and lower arm, respectively. Using a crossover design, both bruises were examined 21 times over 4 weeks. Ten different wavelength (350-535 nm) and filter (yellow, orange, red) combinations were used. Multilevel models were used to analyze 2903 examinations on both upper and lower arms. Results in multivariable models showed after controlling for other covariates 415 and 450 nm using a yellow filter had greater odds of detecting evidence of bruising than white light (Upper Arm: 415 nm: OR = 5.34, 95% CI: 4.35-6.56; 450 nm: OR = 4.08, 95% CI: 3.36-4.96). Under either light source, being female and having more localized fat had increased odds of detecting bruises created by the dropped weight (female: OR = 2.96, 95% CI: 2.37-3.70; fat: OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09-1.34). Our results support ALS as an appropriate tool to enhance concurrent physical assessment of bruises in the presence of known history of injury. Future development and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for ALS application are needed.

Indexed as

LightAdultColorContusionsCross-Over StudiesFemaleForensic PathologyHumansMaleSex FactorsSkinfold ThicknessSkin PigmentationYoung Adultalternate lightbruisesdetectionforensic examinationinjuryultravioletviolence

Identifiers

PMID32012284
PMCPMC7383750
OpenAlexW3004578939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.