Trial reportJournal of forensic sciences2020
Detection of Inflicted Bruises by Alternate Light: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of forensic sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining the use of alternative light sources in medico-legal assessments of blunt-force trauma: a systematic review.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Forensic bruise documentation with alternate light sources: Preliminary observation on deceased individuals in a routine illuminated autopsy setting.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation Framework for Bruise Detection: Systematic ALS/White-Light Training and Skin-Tone Balancing with Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Age Prediction of Hematoma from Hyperspectral Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Infrared thermography for detection of blunt-force trauma injuries during animal abuse investigations.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024Review
- Model Quality in AI-based Bruise Detection: Rethinking IoU and Confidence Thresholds.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- United States ED Visits by Adult Women for Nonfatal Intimate Partner Strangulation, 2006 to 2014: Prevalence and Associated Characteristics.Journal of emergency nursing · 2021Article
- Bruise dating using deep learning.Journal of forensic sciences · 2021Article
- Improving the Forensic Documentation of Injuries Through Alternate Light: A Researcher-Practitioner Partnership.Journal of forensic nursingArticle
- Trauma Forensics in Blunt and Sharp Force Injuries.Journal of the West African College of SurgeonsReview
- Alternate Light Source Findings of Common Topical Cosmetics and Three Removal Methods.Journal of forensic nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bruises are often difficult to detect on victims of violence, potentially impacting investigation and prosecution. The purpose of our randomized controlled trial was to measure the effectiveness of an alternate light source (ALS) within visible and long ultraviolet spectrums at improving bruise detection compared to white light over time. We also examined the effects of skin color, age, gender, localized fat, and injury mechanism on bruise detection. Participants included 157 healthy adults with balanced sampling across six skin color categories. Bruises were created under the controlled application of a paintball pellet and dropped weight to one upper and lower arm, respectively. Using a crossover design, both bruises were examined 21 times over 4 weeks. Ten different wavelength (350-535 nm) and filter (yellow, orange, red) combinations were used. Multilevel models were used to analyze 2903 examinations on both upper and lower arms. Results in multivariable models showed after controlling for other covariates 415 and 450 nm using a yellow filter had greater odds of detecting evidence of bruising than white light (Upper Arm: 415 nm: OR = 5.34, 95% CI: 4.35-6.56; 450 nm: OR = 4.08, 95% CI: 3.36-4.96). Under either light source, being female and having more localized fat had increased odds of detecting bruises created by the dropped weight (female: OR = 2.96, 95% CI: 2.37-3.70; fat: OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09-1.34). Our results support ALS as an appropriate tool to enhance concurrent physical assessment of bruises in the presence of known history of injury. Future development and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for ALS application are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.