Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012193›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Arresting visuospatial stimulation is insufficient to disrupt analogue traumatic intrusions.

Thomas Meyer, Chris R Brewin, John A King, Desiree Nijmeijer, Marcella L Woud, Eni S Becker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas MeyerBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7228-5365
Chris R BrewinDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7462-4460
John A KingDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Desiree NijmeijerBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marcella L WoudMental Health Research and Treatment Center, Department of Psychology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-505X
Eni S BeckerBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity College London · GBRuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrusive memories are a core symptom of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). A growing body of analogue studies using trauma films suggest that carrying out specific demanding tasks (e.g., playing the video game Tetris, pattern tapping) after the analogue trauma can reduce intrusive memories. To examine the mechanism behind this effect, we tested whether mere engagement with attention-grabbing and interesting visual stimuli disrupts intrusive memories, and whether this depends on working memory resources and/or the concurrent activation of trauma film memories. In a total sample of 234 healthy participants, we compared no-task control conditions to a perceptual rating task with visually arresting video clips (i.e., non-emotional, complex, moving displays), to a less arresting task with non-moving, blurred pictures (Study 1), and to more demanding imagery tasks with and without repetitive reminders of the trauma film (Study 2). Generally, we found moderate to strong evidence that none of the conditions lead to differences in intrusion frequency. Moreover, our data suggest that intrusive memories were neither related to individual differences in working memory capacity (i.e., operation span performance; Study 1), nor to the degree of engagement with a visuospatial task (i.e., one-week recognition performance; Study 2). Taken together, our findings suggest that the boundary conditions for successful interference with traumatic intrusions may be more complex and subtle than assumed. Future studies may want to test the role of prediction errors during (re-)consolidation, deliberate efforts to suppress thoughts, or the compatibility of the task demands with the individual's skills.

Indexed as

IndividualityPhotic StimulationStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAttentionEmotionsFemaleHumansLife Change EventsMaleMental RecallRecognition, PsychologySpatial ProcessingStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVideo Games

Identifiers

PMID32012193
PMCPMC6999047
OpenAlexW3003583351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.