ArticlePloS one2020
Multi-trait random regression models increase genomic prediction accuracy for a temporal physiological trait derived from high-throughput phenotyping.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Comparative analysis of genomic prediction approaches for multiple time-resolved traits in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Longitudinal genomic prediction of cacao disease resilience identifies robust witches' broom disease targets.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling, pattern recognition, and spatiotemporal representations of plant growth in simulated and controlled environments: A comprehensive review.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- GPS: Harnessing data fusion strategies to improve the accuracy of machine learning-based genomic and phenotypic selection.Plant communications · 2025Article
- Genomic selection: Essence, applications, and prospects.The plant genome · 2025Review
- Advances in genomic tools for plant breeding: harnessing DNA molecular markers, genomic selection, and genome editing.Biological research · 2024Review
- Leveraging genomics and temporal high-throughput phenotyping to enhance association mapping and yield prediction in sesame.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Rice breeding for low input agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Advances in integrated genomic selection for rapid genetic gain in crop improvement: a review.Planta · 2022Review
- A Bayesian random regression method using mixture priors for genome-enabled analysis of time-series high-throughput phenotyping data.The plant genome · 2022Article
- Comparison of single-trait and multi-trait genomic predictions on agronomic and disease resistance traits in spring wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Article
- Genomic Prediction: Progress and Perspectives for Rice Improvement.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Statistical Methods for the Quantitative Genetic Analysis of High-Throughput Phenotyping Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Genetic dissection of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. resistance via genome-wide association and genomic prediction in tropical maize germplasm.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Article
- High-Throughput Phenotyping and Random Regression Models Reveal Temporal Genetic Control of Soybean Biomass Production.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Integrating High-Throughput Phenotyping and Statistical Genomic Methods to Genetically Improve Longitudinal Traits in Crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Random regression models (RRM) are used extensively for genomic inference and prediction of time-valued traits in animal breeding, but only recently have been used in plant systems. High-throughput phenotyping (HTP) platforms provide a powerful means to collect high-dimensional phenotypes throughout the growing season for large populations. However, to date, selection of an appropriate statistical genomic framework to integrate multiple temporal traits for genomic prediction in plants remains unexplored. Here, we demonstrate the utility of a multi-trait RRM (MT-RRM) for genomic prediction of daily water usage (WU) in rice (Oryza sativa) through joint modeling with shoot biomass (projected shoot area, PSA). Three hundred and fifty-seven accessions were phenotyped daily for WU and PSA over 20 days using a greenhouse-based HTP platform. MT-RRMs that modeled additive genetic and permanent environmental effects for both traits using quadratic Legendre polynomials were used to assess genomic correlations between traits and genomic prediction for WU. Predictive abilities of the MT-RRMs were assessed using two cross-validation (CV) scenarios. The first scenario was designed to predict genetic values for WU at all time points for a set of accessions with unobserved WU. The second scenario was designed to forecast future genetic values for WU for a panel of known accessions with records for WU at earlier time periods. In each scenario we evaluated two MT-RRMs in which PSA records were absent or available for time points in the testing population. Weak to strong genomic correlations between WU and PSA were observed across the days of imaging (0.29-0.870.38-0.80). In both CV scenarios, MT-RRMs showed better predictive abilities compared to single-trait RRM, and prediction accuracies were greatly improved when PSA records were available for the testing population. In summary, these frameworks provide an effective approach to predict temporal physiological traits that are difficult or expensive to quantify in large populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.