Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012172›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Staphylococcus epidermidis in feedings and feces of preterm neonates.

Laura Moles, Marta Gómez, Elena Moroder, Gerardo Bustos, Ana Melgar, Rosa Del Campo, Juan M Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Look Who's Talking: Host and Pathogen Drivers ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intranasal Application ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura MolesDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6902-2097
Marta GómezDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Elena MoroderDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Gerardo BustosNeonatology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0074-5016
Ana MelgarNeonatology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Rosa Del CampoMicrobiology and Parasitology Service, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain.
Juan M RodríguezDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus epidermidis has emerged as the leading agent causing neonatal late-onset sepsis in preterm neonates; although the severity of the episodes caused by this species is often underestimated, it might exert relevant short- and long-term detrimental effects on neonatal outcomes. In this context, the objective of this study was to characterize a collection of S. epidermidis strains obtained from meconium and feces of preterm infants, and to assess the potential role of the enteral feeding tubes as potential reservoirs for this microorganism. A total of 26 preterm infants were enrolled in the study. Meconium and fecal samples were collected weekly during their first month of life (n = 92). Feeding samples were collected after their pass through the enteral feeding tubes (n = 84). S. epidermidis was present in the fecal samples of all the infants in, at least, one sampling time at concentrations ranging from 6.5 to 7.8 log10 CFU/g. Initially, 344 isolates were obtained and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiling allowed the reduction of the collection to 101 strains. Among them, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) profiling showed the presence of 32 different sequence types (ST). Globally, most of the STs to hospital-adapted high-risk clones and belonged to clonal complexes (CC) associated to the hospital environment, such as CC2. The virulence gene most commonly detected among the strains was altE. High resistance rates to macrolides and aminoglycosides were detected and 64% of the strains harboured the mecA gene, which was codified in SCCmec types. Our results indicates the existence of a complex and genetically diverse S. epidermidis population in the NICU environment. A better knowledge of S. epidermidis strains may help to devise strategies to avoid their conversion from symbiont to pathobiont microorganisms in the NICUs.

Indexed as

Molecular EpidemiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEnteral NutritionFecesGenotypeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNeonatal SepsisStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus epidermidisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID32012172
PMCPMC6996929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.