Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012161›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2020

Interaction of yeast Rad51 and Rad52 relieves Rad52-mediated inhibition of de novo telomere addition.

Esther A Epum, Michael J Mohan, Nicholas P Ruppe, Katherine L Friedman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Monomers and short oligomers of human RAD52 promote single-strand annealing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A comprehensive map of hotspots of de novo telomere addition inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Esther A EpumDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Michael J MohanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9691-6811
Nicholas P RuppeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Katherine L FriedmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9047-2030
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Hotspots of de novo telomere addition as mediators of genomic instability in yeastR01GM123292 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FRIEDMAN, KATHERINE LOUISE · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are toxic forms of DNA damage that must be repaired to maintain genome integrity. Telomerase can act upon a DSB to create a de novo telomere, a process that interferes with normal repair and creates terminal deletions. We previously identified sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SiRTAs; Sites of Repair-associated Telomere Addition) that undergo unusually high frequencies of de novo telomere addition, even when the original chromosome break is several kilobases distal to the eventual site of telomerase action. Association of the single-stranded telomere binding protein Cdc13 with a SiRTA is required to stimulate de novo telomere addition. Because extensive resection must occur prior to Cdc13 binding, we utilized these sites to monitor the effect of proteins involved in homologous recombination. We find that telomere addition is significantly reduced in the absence of the Rad51 recombinase, while loss of Rad52, required for Rad51 nucleoprotein filament formation, has no effect. Deletion of RAD52 suppresses the defect of the rad51Δ strain, suggesting that Rad52 inhibits de novo telomere addition in the absence of Rad51. The ability of Rad51 to counteract this effect of Rad52 does not require DNA binding by Rad51, but does require interaction between the two proteins, while the inhibitory effect of Rad52 depends on its interaction with Replication Protein A (RPA). Intriguingly, the genetic interactions we report between RAD51 and RAD52 are similar to those previously observed in the context of checkpoint adaptation. Forced recruitment of Cdc13 fully restores telomere addition in the absence of Rad51, suggesting that Rad52, through its interaction with RPA-coated single-stranded DNA, inhibits the ability of Cdc13 to bind and stimulate telomere addition. Loss of the Rad51-Rad52 interaction also stimulates a subset of Rad52-dependent microhomology-mediated repair (MHMR) events, consistent with the known ability of Rad51 to prevent single-strand annealing.

Indexed as

Recombinational DNA RepairDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGene Knockout TechniquesMutationProtein BindingRad51 RecombinaseRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTelomeraseTelomereTelomere-Binding ProteinsCdc13 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD51 protein, S cerevisiaeRad51 RecombinaseRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRAD52 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTelomeraseTelomere-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32012161
PMCPMC7018233
OpenAlexW3003347135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.