Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012115›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Prospective Evaluation of HIV Testing Technologies in a Clinical Setting: Protocol for Project DETECT.

Joanne D Stekler, Lauren R Violette, Hollie A Clark, Sarah J McDougal, Lisa A Niemann, David A Katz, Pollyanna R Chavez, Laura G Wesolowski, Steven F Ethridge, Vanessa M McMahan and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04793750 (Ending the HIV Epidemic Through Point-of-Care Technologies), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04793750 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Ending the HIV Epidemic Through Point-of-Care Technologies (EHPOC): Performance Evaluation of Novel POC HIV Tests in Baltimore

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled224ConditionsHIV Infections, SyphilisArmsCepheid GeneXpert HIV-1 Qual POC HIV VL test, DPP HIV-Syphilis test system, OraQuick
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Performance evaluation of the Aptima HIV-1 RNA Quant assay on the Panther system using the standard and dilution protocols.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
  3. Performance evaluation of four point-of-care HIV tests using unprocessed specimens.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joanne D SteklerDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8064-3011
Lauren R VioletteDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6469-7298
Hollie A ClarkDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2563-4424
Sarah J McDougalDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-7002
Lisa A NiemannDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-8921
David A KatzDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7786-0194
Pollyanna R ChavezDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-3272
Laura G WesolowskiDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6710-0370
Steven F EthridgeDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0189-0397
Vanessa M McMahanDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2331-7206
Andy Cornelius-HudsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5919-3527
Kevin P DelaneyDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7562-7647
University of Washington · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USPublic Health – Seattle & King County · US

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV testing guidelines provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are continually changing to reflect advancements in new testing technology. Evaluation of existing and new point-of-care (POC) HIV tests is crucial to inform testing guidelines and provide information to clinicians and other HIV test providers. Characterizing the performance of POC HIV tests using unprocessed specimens can provide estimates for the window period of detection, or the time from HIV acquisition to test positivity, which allows clinicians and other HIV providers to select the appropriate POC HIV tests for persons who may be recently infected with HIV.

objectiveThis paper describes the protocols and procedures used to evaluate the performance of the newest POC tests and determine their sensitivity during early HIV infection.

methodsProject DETECT is a CDC-funded study that is evaluating POC HIV test performance. Part 1 is a cross-sectional, retrospective study comparing behavioral characteristics and HIV prevalence of the overall population of the Public Health-Seattle & King County (PHSKC) Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Clinic to Project DETECT participants enrolled in part 2. Part 2 is a cross-sectional, prospective study evaluating POC HIV tests in real time using unprocessed whole blood and oral fluid specimens. A POC nucleic acid test (NAT) was added to the panel of HIV tests in June 2018. Part 3 is a longitudinal, prospective study evaluating seroconversion sensitivity of POC HIV tests through serial follow-up testing. For comparison, HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1/HIV-2 antigen/antibody tests are also performed for participants enrolled in part 2 or 3. A behavioral survey that collects information about demographics, history of HIV testing, STD history, symptoms of acute HIV infection, substance use, sexual behaviors in the aggregate and with recent partners, and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy is completed at each part 2 or 3 visit.

resultsBetween September 2015 and March 2019, there were 14,990 Project DETECT-eligible visits (part 1) to the PHSKC STD Clinic resulting in 1819 part 2 Project DETECT study visits. The longitudinal study within Project DETECT (part 3) enrolled 27 participants with discordant POC test results from their part 2 visit, and 10 (37%) were followed until they had fully seroconverted with concordant positive POC test results. Behavioral survey data and HIV test results, sensitivity, and specificity will be presented elsewhere.

conclusionsStudies such as Project DETECT are critical for evaluating POC HIV test devices as well as describing characteristics of persons at risk for HIV acquisition in the United States. HIV tests in development, including POC NATs, will provide new opportunities for HIV testing programs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/16332.

Indexed as

acute HIV infectionHIV testingnucleic acid testspoint-of-care tests

Identifiers

PMID32012115
PMCPMC7011122
OpenAlexW2984943685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.