Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012049›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Digital Competencies and Attitudes Toward Digital Adherence Solutions Among Elderly Patients Treated With Novel Anticoagulants: Qualitative Study.

Maximilian Herrmann, Philip Boehme, Arne Hansen, Katharina Jansson, Patrick Rebacz, Jan P Ehlers, Thomas Mondritzki, Hubert Truebel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Approaches to Improvement of Digital Health Literacy (eHL) in the Context of Person-Centered Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilian Herrmann *Didactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4788-6182
Philip Boehme *Didactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2285-9273
Arne HansenDidactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-0737
Katharina JanssonResearch & Development, Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Aktiengesellschaft, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8119-7137
Patrick RebaczDidactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8782-8593
Jan P EhlersDidactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6306-4173
Thomas MondritzkiDidactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0162-773X
Hubert TruebelDidactics and Educational Research in Health Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6413-7864
Witten/Herdecke University · DEBayer (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonadherence to medication is a driver of morbidity and mortality, and complex medication regimens in patients with chronic diseases foster the problem. Digital technology might help, but despite numerous solutions being developed, none are currently widely used, and acceptance rates remain low, especially among the elderly.

objectiveThis study aimed to better understand and operationalize how new digital solutions can be evaluated. Particularly, the goal was to identify factors that help digital approaches targeting adherence to become more widely accepted.

methodsA qualitative study using a conceptual grounded theory approach was conducted. We included patients aged 65 years and older who routinely took new oral anticoagulants. To generate theses about the digital competencies of the target group with daily medication intake, face-to-face interviews were conducted, recorded, and anonymized. After coding the interviews, categories were generated, discussed, and combined with several theses until saturation of the statements was reached.

resultsThe methodological approach led to the finding that after interviews in 20 of 77 potentially available patients, a saturation of statements was reached. The average patient's age was 75 years, and 50% (10/20) of the subjects were female. The data identified five main coding categories-Diseases and medicine, Technology, Autonomy, Patient narrative, and Attitude toward technologies-each including positive and negative subcategories. Main categories and subcategories were summarized as Adherence Radar, which can be considered as a framework to assess the potential of adherence solutions in the process of prototyping and can be applied to all adherence tools in a holistic manner.

conclusionsThe Adherence Radar can be used to increase the acceptance rate of digital solutions targeting adherence. For a patient-centric design, an app should be adapted to the individual patient's needs. According to our results, this application should be based on gender and educational background as well as the individual physician-patient relationship. If used in a proper, individualized manner, digital adherence solutions could become a new cornerstone for the treatment of chronically ill individuals.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgedAnticoagulantsAttitudeFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchTelemedicineAnticoagulantscompliancedelivery of health carediffusion of innovationdigital competenciesdigital devicedigital healtheHealthelderly patientsgrounded theorymedication adherencemHealthsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID32012049
PMCPMC7007598
OpenAlexW2976334458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.