Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32012037›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2020

Development of a National Caregiver Health Survey for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Qualitative Study of Cognitive Interviews and Verbal Probing.

Jacob Kedroske, Sarah Koblick, Dima Chaar, Amanda Mazzoli, Maureen O'Brien, Lilian Yahng, Rebecca Vue, Grant Chappell, Ji Youn Shin, David A Hanauer and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06991673 (Adolescent Surgery Roadmap Feasibility and Acceptability Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06991673 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Adolescent Surgery Roadmap Feasibility and Acceptability Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2025 to 2029Enrolled100ConditionsPediatric Surgical ProceduresArmsBehavioral Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob KedroskeBlood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3414-2253
Sarah KoblickBlood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1936-7526
Dima ChaarSchool of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-0179
Amanda MazzoliBlood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6625-3092
Maureen O'BrienInstitute for Social Research, Survey Research Operations, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5717-4664
Lilian YahngCenter for Survey Research, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0768-6618
Rebecca VueBlood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-7164
Grant ChappellBlood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7236-5402
Ji Youn ShinCollege of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-3897
David A HanauerMichigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6931-3791
Sung Won ChoiBlood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6321-3834
University of Michigan · USIndiana University Bloomington · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Roadmap 2.0: A randomized controlled trial using a technology-mediated platform in family caregivers of BMT patientsR01HL146354 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHOI, SUNG WON · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoadmap 1.0 is a mobile health app that was previously developed for caregivers of patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Formative research targeted toward its end users (caregivers) can help inform app design and development, allowing additional components to be incorporated into the app, which can then be tested in a future randomized controlled trial.

objectiveThis study aimed to create a methodologically rigorous national survey that would help inform the development of Roadmap 2.0.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, qualitative research study that took place between November 18, 2018, and February 7, 2019, in a blood and marrow transplant unit within a large academic medical institution in the midwestern part of the United States. Cognitive interviews, including think-aloud and verbal probing techniques, were conducted in 10 adult caregivers (≥18 years) of patients who had undergone HSCT.

resultsMost participants were female (9/10, 90%), white (9/10, 90%), married (9/10, 90%), employed at least part time (6/10, 60%), caregivers of adult patients (7/10, 70%), and had some college education (9/10, 90%) and an annual household income of $60,000 or higher (6/10, 60%). All but one interview was audio-recorded, with permission. Overall, participants were engaged in the cognitive interview process of the draft survey, which included 7 topics. The interviews highlighted areas wherein survey items could be further refined, such as offering more response choices (eg, "NA") or clarifying the type of transplant (eg, autologous or allogeneic) or context of transplant care (eg, pre-HSCT, during HSCT, post-HSCT, inpatient, and outpatient). Apart from these findings, the items in demographics, caregiving experiences, technology, positive activities, and mood were generally interpreted as intended. On the basis of the transcript data and field notes by the interviewer, items within self-efficacy (Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale) and coping (Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced inventory) questionnaires generated more confusion among interviewer and participants, reflecting difficulties in interpreting the meaning of some survey items.

conclusionsThis study incorporated the four cognitive aspects of survey methodology that describe the question-answering process-(1) comprehension, (2) information retrieval, (3) judgment and decision making, and (4) responding-by using the think-aloud and probing techniques in cognitive interviews. We conclude that this methodologically rigorous process informed revisions and improved our final questionnaire design. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.49188.

Indexed as

caregivershematopoietic stem cell transplantationmobile applicationsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32012037
PMCPMC7005696
OpenAlexW2995057949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.