ArticleBJS open2020
Trainee performance in radical gastrectomy and its effect on outcomes.
Article in BJS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delivering esophago-gastric cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: a surgical perspective.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to determine whether trainee involvement in D2 gastrectomies was associated with adverse outcomes.
methodsData from a prospectively created database of consecutive patients undergoing open D2 total (TG) or subtotal (STG) gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2009 and January 2014 were reviewed. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes were compared in patients operated on by consultants and those treated by trainees under consultant supervision.
resultsA total of 272 D2 open gastrectomies were performed, 123 (45·2 per cent) by trainees. There was no significant difference between consultants and trainees in median duration of surgery (TG: 240 (range 102-505) versus 240 (170-375) min respectively, P = 0·452; STG: 225 (150-580) versus 212 (125-380) min, P = 0·192), number of resected nodes (TG: 30 (13-101) versus 30 (11-102), P = 0·681; STG: 26 (5-103) versus 25 (1-63), P = 0·171), length of hospital stay (TG: 15 (7-78) versus 15 (8-65) days, P = 0·981; STG: 10 (6-197) versus 14 (7-85) days, P = 0·242), overall morbidity (TG: 44 versus 49 per cent, P = 0·314; STG: 34 versus 25 per cent, P = 0·113) or mortality (TG: 4 versus 2 per cent; P = 0·293). No difference in predicted 5-year overall survival was noted between the two cohorts (TG: 68 per cent for consultants versus 77 per cent for trainees, P = 0·254; STG: 70 versus 75 per cent respectively, P = 0·512). The trainee cohort had lower median blood loss for both TG (360 (range 90-1200) ml versus 600 (70-2350) ml for consultants; P = 0·042) and STG (235 (50-1000) versus 360 (50-3000) ml respectively; P = 0·053).
conclusionClinical outcomes were not compromised by supervised trainee involvement in D2 open gastrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.