Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32011720›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2020

Adaptations and patient responses to behavioral intervention components in a depression-focused chronic disease care model implemented in India.

Leslie C M Johnson, Lydia Chwastiak, Subramani Poongothai, Nikhil Tandon, Ranjit Mohan Anjana, Sosale Aravind, Gumpeny Ramachandra Sridhar, Deepa Rao, Viswanathan Mohan, Mohammed K Ali

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. On Psychology and Psychiatry in Diabetes.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Leslie C M JohnsonHubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lydia ChwastiakDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Subramani PoongothaiDepartment of Clinical Trials, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Nikhil TandonDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India.
Ranjit Mohan AnjanaDepartment of Diabetology, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai, India.
Sosale AravindDiabetes Care and Research Center, Diacon Hospital, Bengaluru, India.
Gumpeny Ramachandra SridharEndocrine and Diabetes Centre, Visakhapatnam, India.
Deepa RaoDepartment of Global Health and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Viswanathan MohanDepartment of Diabetology, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation and Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai, India.
Mohammed K AliHubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Madras Diabetes Research Foundation · INEmory University · USUniversity of Washington · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INDiacon Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated care models offer one approach to treat patients with chronic multimorbidity. However, because these models consist of multiple components designed to provide individualized care, they should be adapted to best meet the needs of patients in diverse settings. This paper presents qualitative and quantitative data from a realist process evaluation embedded in the INtegrating DEPrEssioN and Diabetes treatmENT (INDEPENDENT) study to uncover what worked, for whom, how, and in what circumstances. We aimed to examine adaptations made to a care coordinator-led behavioral intervention, and how patients responded to adaptations, through a secondary analysis of these data. A purposive sample of 62 patients and 3 care coordinators were recruited based on their involvement with the INDEPENDENT care model across two clinics. Patients were interviewed and surveyed about their experiences in the care model and care coordinators were interviewed about their experiences implementing intervention components. Interview data were coded for reported modifications in intervention content, tools, and delivery; then, these adaptations were categorized by how they served to enhance implementation in the Indian context. Adaptations made in the delivery of this care model served two functions: (a) to improve health promotion communication between care coordinators and patients and (b) to improve patient engagement. Patients' expressed needs were consistent with what care coordinators perceived. Patients were satisfied with adaptations designed to improve intervention fit for local contexts. Study findings demonstrate that adapting components of an integrated care model can enhance patient satisfaction and engagement with behavioral interventions.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyDepressionChronic DiseaseHealth PromotionHumansIndiaAdaptationDiabetes managementIntegrated careScale-up

Identifiers

PMID32011720
PMCPMC7020388
OpenAlexW3004649439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.