Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32011655›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2020

Differential effect of lacosamide on Nav1.7 variants from responsive and non-responsive patients with small fibre neuropathy.

Julie I R Labau, Mark Estacion, Brian S Tanaka, Bianca T A de Greef, Janneke G J Hoeijmakers, Margot Geerts, Monique M Gerrits, Hubert J M Smeets, Catharina G Faber, Ingemar S J Merkies and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Targeting NaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Inhibiting Nav1.8 for pain: Lessons from patients and from neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Effective Modulation by Lacosamide on Cumulative Inhibition ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Small Fiber Neuropathy.Current pain and headache reports · 2022
    Review
  18. iPSCs and DRGs: stepping stones to new pain therapies.Trends in molecular medicine · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Lacosamide Inhibition of NaFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Julie I R LabauDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Mark EstacionDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Brian S TanakaDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Bianca T A de GreefDepartment of Neurology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Janneke G J HoeijmakersDepartment of Neurology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Margot GeertsDepartment of Neurology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Monique M GerritsDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hubert J M SmeetsDepartment of Genetics and Cell Biology, Clinical Genomics Unit, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Catharina G FaberDepartment of Neurology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ingemar S J MerkiesDepartment of Neurology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Giuseppe LauriaNeuroalgology Unit, IRCCS Foundation, "Carlo Besta" Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Sulayman D Dib-HajjDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Stephen G WaxmanDepartment of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Maastricht University · NLYale University · USMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small fibre neuropathy is a common pain disorder, which in many cases fails to respond to treatment with existing medications. Gain-of-function mutations of voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.7 underlie dorsal root ganglion neuronal hyperexcitability and pain in a subset of patients with small fibre neuropathy. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that lacosamide, which blocks sodium channels in a use-dependent manner, attenuates pain in some patients with Nav1.7 mutations; however, only a subgroup of these patients responded to the drug. Here, we used voltage-clamp recordings to evaluate the effects of lacosamide on five Nav1.7 variants from patients who were responsive or non-responsive to treatment. We show that, at the clinically achievable concentration of 30 μM, lacosamide acts as a potent sodium channel inhibitor of Nav1.7 variants carried by responsive patients, via a hyperpolarizing shift of voltage-dependence of both fast and slow inactivation and enhancement of use-dependent inhibition. By contrast, the effects of lacosamide on slow inactivation and use-dependence in Nav1.7 variants from non-responsive patients were less robust. Importantly, we found that lacosamide selectively enhances fast inactivation only in variants from responders. Taken together, these findings begin to unravel biophysical underpinnings that contribute to responsiveness to lacosamide in patients with small fibre neuropathy carrying select Nav1.7 variants.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCells, CulturedHumansLacosamideMembrane PotentialsMiddle AgedMutationNAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPainPain MeasurementPatch-Clamp TechniquesSmall Fiber NeuropathySodium Channel BlockersLacosamideNAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelSCN9A protein, humanSodium Channel BlockerselectrophysiologylacosamideNav1.7 mutationsneuropathic painsmall fibre neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID32011655
PMCPMC7089662
OpenAlexW3005107756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.