SynthesisJAMA pediatrics2020
Assessment of C-Reactive Protein Diagnostic Test Accuracy for Late-Onset Infection in Newborn Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of four biomarkers in detecting neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries.BMJ paediatrics open · 2023Pooled it
- Sustainable neonatal CLABSI surveillance: consensus towards new criteria in the Netherlands.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2021Guideline
- Starting complementary feeding with vegetables only increases vegetable acceptance at 9 months: a randomized controlled trial.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2022Trial
- Targeted proteomics in late-onset neonatal sepsis: an exploratory analysis.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Beyond accuracy: translating machine learning risk models into meaningful clinical decision support in neonatal intensive care.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Comparison of predictive values of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores for mortality in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- From Gram-Negative Neonatal Sepsis to Neurodevelopmental Impairment: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Preterm Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Is the Neonatal Sepsis Screen More Futile Than Useful in Clinical Practice? Yes.Indian pediatrics · 2026Article
- CBC ratios for early sepsis risk stratification in newborns: EOS/LOS versus non-septic controls.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Assessment of Serum Interleukins 18 and 22 in Predicting Neonatal Sepsis and Mortality: A Case-Control Study.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2026Article
- Neonatal leucocyte cell population data: reference intervals and relevance for detecting sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Critical appraisal of presepsin for diagnosing late-onset sepsis in critically ill neonates.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Placental pathologic score 1-2 subclinical abnormalities and early neonatal clinical indicators in term infants: a retrospective study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Systems biology approaches to unravelling neonatal sepsis and potential for precision diagnostics and therapeutics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Attenuated C-reactive protein response to infection in newborns and neonates: an age-stratified analysis in children with sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Theoretical impact of a bedside decision-making tool on antibiotic use for suspected neonatal healthcare-associated infection: an observational study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Plasma Bile Acid Profiling Reveals Novel Early Diagnostic Biomarkers for Pediatric Sepsis.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of inflammatory biomarkers for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: IL-6, IL-8, SAA, CRP, and PCT.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- Multicentre external validation of the Neonatal Healthcare-associated infectiOn Prediction (NeoHoP) score: a retrospective case-control study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Rapid and accurate diagnosis of late-onset infection in newborn infants could inform treatment decisions and avoid unnecessary administration of antibiotics. Objective: To compare the accuracy of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) with that of microbiological blood culture for diagnosing late-onset infection in newborns. Data Sources: MEDLINE (1946-2019), Embase (1946-2019), and Science Citation Index (1900-2019) databases were searched for references (any language). The MeSH search terms included were "exp infant, newborn/" or "premature birth/" plus free text synonyms; and "C-reactive protein/" plus free text synonyms; and "exp sepsis/" or "exp bacterial infections/" plus free text synonyms. The proceedings from relevant conferences and references of identified papers were scrutinized. Authors were contacted to request missing data. Study Selection: Cohort and cross-sectional studies were included that compared the accuracy of serum CRP levels with microbiological culture results to diagnose late-onset (>72 hours after birth) infection in newborns (any gestational age) hospitalized after birth. Two reviewers assessed study eligibility. Among 10 394 records, 148 studies were assessed as full texts. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline extension for Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) reviews was followed. Two reviewers assessed the method quality of each study using guidance from the Cochrane Screening and Diagnostic Test Methods Group (adapted from the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary meta-analysis outcome was diagnostic test accuracy of serum CRP level taken at initial investigation of an infant with suspected late-onset infection. The median specificity (proportion of true-negative results) and calculated pooled sensitivity (proportion of true-positive results) were determined by generating hierarchical summary receiver characteristic operating curves. Results: In total, 22 studies with 2255 infants were included (sample size range, 11-590 infants). Participants in most studies were preterm (<37 weeks) or very low-birth weight (<1500 g) infants. Two studies additionally enrolled infants born at term. Most studies (16) used a prespecified CRP level cutoff for a "positive" index test (5-10 mg/L), and most studies (17) used the culture of a pathogenic microorganism from blood as the reference standard. Risk of bias was low with independent assessment of index and reference tests. At median specificity (0.74), pooled sensitivity was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.50-0.72). Adding serum CRP level to the assessment of an infant with a 40% pretest probability of late-onset infection (the median for the included studies) generated posttest probabilities of 26% for a negative test result and 61% for a positive test result. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that determination of serum CRP level at initial evaluation of an infant with suspected late-onset infection is unlikely to aid early diagnosis or to select infants to undergo further investigation or treatment with antimicrobial therapy or other interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.