Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32011575›Full record

ArticleOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2020

Assessing the Impact of En Face Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Imaging on Clinical Decision Making for Glaucoma Suspects.

Brett J King, William H Swanson, Stephanie A Klemencic, Michael Chaglasian, Bruce A Teitelbaum, Christopher A Clark, Ashley M Speilburg, Jane Ann Grogg, Todd D Peabody

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Presumed activated retinal astrocytes and Müller cells in healthy and glaucomatous eyes detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brett J King
William H SwansonIndiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana.
Stephanie A KlemencicIllinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois.
Michael ChaglasianIllinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois.
Bruce A TeitelbaumIllinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois.
Christopher A ClarkIndiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana.
Ashley M SpeilburgIllinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois.
Jane Ann GroggIndiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana.
Todd D PeabodyIndiana University School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana.
Indiana University Bloomington · USIllinois College of Optometry · US

Funding

3D RNFL Structure And High-Resolution Perimetry For Assessing Glaucomatous DamageR01EY024542 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI SWANSON, WILLIAM H. · 2014 to 2023
$3.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceAssessing and managing glaucoma are a complicated process in which experience plays a key role in decision making. Although advanced glaucoma is more easily diagnosed, patients with early glaucoma or who present with suspicious findings are more complicated. A need to aid clinicians in the decision-making process exists. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of en face ocular coherence tomography images to clinical decision making when added to standard presentations of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and automated perimetry.

methodsThirty participants from two centers presenting either as a glaucoma suspect or for an initial glaucoma evaluation were enrolled. Six masked investigators were given standard presentations of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and perimetry. They were asked if glaucomatous damage was present as well as a recommended plan of management on 5-point Likert scales. They were then given en face images of the retinal nerve fiber layer in three different presentations coupled with the standard presentation, and the questions were repeated. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was generated.

resultsThe masked investigators had moderate agreement from the standard presentation for assessment (ICC = 0.67 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.54 to 0.80] and ICC = 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.80], respectively), as well as with the addition of the en face images (ICC = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). The en face images tended to change decisions in both assessment and plan toward likely to have glaucoma and likely to start treatment.

conclusionsThe addition of en face images to a standard presentation has an impact on clinical decision making. Although en face images seem to influence the decision toward likely to have glaucoma and likely to treat, it is unclear if this leads to a more accurate decision. Further investigations seem warranted to assess sensitivity and specificity of this approach.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOcular HypertensionPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRetinal Ganglion CellsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32011575
PMCPMC7004462
OpenAlexW3005420994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.