Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32011135›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2020

Promiscuous Ribozymes and Their Proposed Role in Prebiotic Evolution.

Evan Janzen, Celia Blanco, Huan Peng, Josh Kenchel, Irene A Chen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolution of the substrate specificity of an RNA ligase ribozyme from phosphorimidazole to triphosphate activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Viruses in astrobiology.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan JanzenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93109, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1646-3363
Celia BlancoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93109, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1536-1493
Huan PengDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93109, United States.
Josh KenchelDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93109, United States.
Irene A ChenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93109, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6040-7927
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Understanding how bacteriophages affect wound ecologies and developing new tools to harness bacteria-phage interactionsDP2GM123457 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI CHEN, IRENE ANN · 2016 to 2016
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM123457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of enzymes, including ribozymes, to catalyze side reactions is believed to be essential to the evolution of novel biochemical activities. It has been speculated that the earliest ribozymes, whose emergence marked the origin of life, were low in activity but high in promiscuity, and that these early ribozymes gave rise to specialized descendants with higher activity and specificity. Here, we review the concepts related to promiscuity and examine several cases of highly promiscuous ribozymes. We consider the evidence bearing on the question of whether

Indexed as

Evolution, ChemicalRNA, CatalyticSubstrate SpecificityRNA, Catalytic

Identifiers

PMID32011135
PMCPMC7291351
OpenAlexW3005211325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.