ReviewBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2020
A systematic review on the accuracy of zirconia crowns and fixed dental prostheses.
Review in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of restorative material, intraoral scanner, and digital workflow on the marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM all-ceramic crowns: anThe journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
- Fit of Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses Made from Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal by 3D Printing and Milling.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Pontic Length on the Structural Integrity of Zirconia Fixed Partial Dentures (FPDs).Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Article
- Marginal fit and retention force of zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses in the posterior region with different designs.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Fifteen-year recall period on zirconia-based single crowns and fixed dental prostheses. A prospective observational study.BDJ open · 2024Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Scanning Strategy on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners : In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Scanning Strategy on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners.Galen medical journal · 2024Article
- Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D-printing technique.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Fitness and Accuracy of Milled and Three-Dimensionally Printed Inlays.European journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- Mechanical properties of additively manufactured zirconia with alumina air abrasion surface treatment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Micro-CT Marginal and Internal Fit Evaluation of CAD/CAM High-Performance Polymer Onlay Restorations.Polymers · 2023Article
- Performance of high-translucent zirconia CAD/CAM fixed dental prostheses using a digital workflow: A clinical study up to 6 years.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- The Effect of Scanning Strategy on Intraoral Scanner's Accuracy.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- In Vitro Study of Comparative Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit between Heat-Pressed and CAD-CAM Monolithic Glass-Ceramic Restorations after Thermal Aging.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Comparing the influence of cuspal angulation, occlusal loading, and connector widths between tooth- and implant-supported zirconia fixed dental prosthesis.Medical journal, Armed Forces IndiaArticle
- Marginal Fit of Full Contour Monolithic Zirconia in Different Thicknesses and Layered Zirconia Crowns.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.