Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32010858›Full record

ArticlePediatric quality & safety

A Retrospective Analysis of Intervention for Testicular Torsion: Searching for a Hallmark of High Reliability.

Jennifer K Calder, Bennett W Calder, Chase A Arbra, Robert A Cina

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 73% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer K CalderDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, S.C.
Bennett W CalderDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, S.C.
Chase A ArbraDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, S.C.
Robert A CinaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, S.C.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consistent delivery of high-quality care is a marker of health-care system reliability. Although clinically abstracted outcome databases have revolutionized surgical quality improvement efforts for many high-volume procedures, their utility in aiding the improvement of time-sensitive processes is less clear. The purpose of this study was to determine whether process measures surrounding the delivery of timely surgical care could delineate the variability in the outcome of patients with testicular torsion. Our secondary aim was to use the data to drive quality improvement efforts locally.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of encounters for testicular torsion in patients less than 18 years. Characteristics of patients undergoing detorsion/orchiopexy and orchiectomy were compared. We evaluated orchiectomy as a function of age, insurance status, time of presentation, duration of symptoms, time to ultrasound, and time to surgery.

resultsOver 10 years, we identified 46 patients, of whom 21 met inclusion criteria. Twelve patients (57.1%) underwent detorsion/orchiopexy, whereas 9 patients underwent orchiectomy. After-hours presentation and age were not predictive of orchiectomy, whereas the duration of symptoms was predictive of orchiectomy. Differences in time to surgery for orchiopexy and orchiectomy groups approached but did not reach significance (

conclusionsSignificant variability persists in the timely delivery of comprehensive and coordinated care for children suffering from time-sensitive surgical conditions. Pediatric surgical programs would realize significant benefit from a surgical quality improvement program that incorporates validated process metrics, along with outcome measures, to help drive efficiencies and integrate care more effectively.

Identifiers

PMID32010858
PMCPMC6946220
OpenAlexW2997616751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.