ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Intervention to Achieve Sustained Improvement in Hand Hygiene Reliability in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suboptimal hand hygiene (HH) remains a significant modifiable cause of healthcare-associated infections in the intensive care unit. We report a single-center, quality improvement project aimed at improving adherence to optimal HH among physicians, nurse practitioners, and nursing staff, and to sustain any improvement over time.
methodsA key driver diagram was developed to identify 5 primary drivers of change: leadership support, education initiatives, patient-family engagement, increased audit frequency, and individual feedback to promote accountability. We examined HH compliance over 3 years in 3 phases (pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention). The intervention period involved a multimodal approach designed to influence unit culture as well as individual HH practice. HH screens were installed outside the patient rooms to provide just-in-time reminders and display of regularly updated HH adherence data for provider groups.
resultsWe recorded 6,563 HH opportunities, providers included nurses (66%), attendings (12%), fellow/resident (16%), and nurse practitioners (NP) (6%). All clinical groups demonstrated HH compliance >90% during the post-intervention period. The improvements in practice were sustained for a year after the intervention.
conclusionOur report highlights modifiable factors that impact HH and may inform quality improvement interventions aimed at improving HH compliance at other centers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.