ReviewEndoscopy international open2020
A systematic review of the role of non-magnified endoscopy for the assessment of
Review in Endoscopy international open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel endoscopic techniques for the diagnosis of gastricFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review with meta-analysis: artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of oesophageal diseases.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction of Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Endoscopic Images: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Hemostatic Decision-Making: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications and Implementation Barriers.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Can artificial intelligence improve the diagnosis and management of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis?World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic diagnosis system for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection: a multicenter study.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Translational artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders: Advancing intelligent clinical decision-making for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Experts' Perceptions Regarding Testing for Helicobacter pylori Infection During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Subsequent Eradication Therapy.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025Article
- Could near focus endoscopy, narrow-band imaging, and acetic acid improve the visualization of microscopic features of stomach mucosa?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Diagnostic usefulness of deep learning methods forJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Article
- Mucosal patterns change afterWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Traditional and Modern Diagnostic Approaches in Diagnosing PediatricChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A prospective study for evaluating the effect of gastric targeted biopsy sampling with I-scan optical enhancement on the diagnostic yield of CLOtest forHealth science reports · 2022Article
- Association between regular arrangement of collecting venules and Helicobacter pylori status in routine endoscopy.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Enlarged folds on endoscopic gastritis as a predictor for submucosal invasion of gastric cancers.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021Article
- Endoscopic Diagnosis for H. pylori Infection: White Light Imaging (WLI) vs. Image-Enhanced Endoscopy (IEE).Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- StandardWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Clinical applicability of gastroscopy with narrow-band imaging for the diagnosis ofWorld journal of clinical cases · 2020Review
- Use of artificial intelligence for the detection ofAnnals of gastroenterologyArticle
- Diagnostic approach toAnnals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.