ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2019
Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts Versus Hamstring Autografts Using the Same Suspensory Fixations in ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effect of graft type and gender on early to mid-term clinical outcomes.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2024Article
- Effect of Different Screw Materials on ACL Reconstruction With the Tape Locking Screw Technique: A Retrospective Study From the FAST Cohort.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Triple Hybrid Tibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023Article
- Arthroscopic Visualization Is a Reliable Method of Confirming Femoral Button Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Return to Play and Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the National Women's Soccer League.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Current trends in graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - part I: anatomy, biomechanics, graft incorporation and fixation.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Patient Decision Making in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Discrete Choice Experiment Examining Graft Preference.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Anterior to Posterior Bone Plug Suture Tunnels Provide Optimal Biomechanics for Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provides excellent clinical outcomes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
- Preoperative ultrasound predicts the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft more accurately than preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
- A Systematic Approach for Stronger Documentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Choice.Cureus · 2021Review
- Differences in artificial ligament graft osseointegration of the anterior cruciate ligament in a sheep model: a comparison between interference screw and cortical suspensory fixation.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Comparison of the Sterilization Efficiency of 3 Disinfectants for Dropped Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Review
- [Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament with autologous ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBone-patellar tendon-bone (BPB) autografts and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are 2 popular choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Although existing meta-analyses have explored the clinical outcomes between BPB and HT autografts, none have based their analysis on studies with just femoral suspensory fixation methods. PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare clinical outcomes, particularly graft failure and knee stability, of ACLR with BPB or HT autografts with suspensory femoral fixation. STUDY
designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
methodsA literature search was conducted of studies reporting single-bundle ACLR with BPB autografts and HT autografts with suspensory fixation with a minimum 24-month follow-up. Graft failure rate, knee stability, and clinical outcomes were compared for BPB versus HT autografts. Knee stability was measured with the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT-1000/2000 arthrometer side-to-side difference (SSD). Clinical outcomes were measured with Lysholm scores and the Tegner activity scale, as well as rate of return to preinjury sports. Donor site morbidity among included studies was reviewed. A random-effects model was used for calculations of summary estimates. Subgroup, sensitivity, and trial sequential analyses were conducted.
resultsFive studies were included. Graft failure was seen more often in the HT group than the BPB group, and this was statistically significant (
conclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences in knee stability and knee functional outcomes between BPB and HT autografts with suspensory fixation. More evidence is needed to prove the lower risk of failure with use of BTB autograft with suspensory fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.