Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32010602›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2019

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anti-infective Agents during Continuous Veno-venous Hemofiltration in Critically Ill Patients: Lessons Learned from an Ancillary Study of the IVOIRE Trial.

Dominique Breilh, Patrick M Honore, David De Bels, Jason A Roberts, Jean Baptiste Gordien, Catherine Fleureau, Antoine Dewitte, Julien Coquin, Hadrien Rozé, Paul Perez and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Dominique BreilhLaboratory of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacy, INSERM U1034, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Segalen, Pessac, France.
Patrick M HonoreIntensive Care Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann-Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
David De BelsIntensive Care Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann-Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine & Centre for Translational Anti-infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Jean Baptiste GordienLaboratory of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacy, INSERM U1034, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Segalen, Pessac, France.
Catherine FleureauCHU Bordeaux, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Magellan Medico-Surgical Centre, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Antoine DewitteCHU Bordeaux, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Magellan Medico-Surgical Centre, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Julien CoquinCHU Bordeaux, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Magellan Medico-Surgical Centre, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Hadrien RozéCHU Bordeaux, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Magellan Medico-Surgical Centre, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Paul PerezCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique et Épidémiologique, France.
Rachid AttouIntensive Care Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann-Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Sebastien RedantIntensive Care Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann-Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Luc KugenerIntensive Care Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann-Brugmann University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie-Claude SauxLaboratory of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacy, INSERM U1034, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Segalen, Pessac, France.
Herbert D SpapenAgeing & Pathology Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Alexandre OuattaraCHU Bordeaux, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Magellan Medico-Surgical Centre, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Olivier Joannes-BoyauCHU Bordeaux, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Magellan Medico-Surgical Centre, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
IVOIRE study group
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann · BEUniversité de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRThe University of Queensland · AUVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemofiltration rate, changes in blood and ultrafiltration flow, and discrepancies between the prescribed and administered doses strongly influence pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of antimicrobial agents during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) in critically ill patients.

methodsAncillary data were from the prospective multicenter IVOIRE (hIgh VOlume in Intensive caRE) study. High volume (HV, 70 mL/kg/h) was at random compared with standard volume (SV, 35 mL/kg/h) CVVH in septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). PK/PD parameters for all antimicrobial agents used in each patient were studied during five days.

resultsAntimicrobial treatment met efficacy targets for both percentage of time above the minimal inhibitory concentration and inhibitory quotient. A significant correlation was observed between the ultrafiltration flow and total systemic clearance (Spearman test:

conclusionsThis study confirms that CVVH influences the PK/PD behavior of most antimicrobial agents. Antimicrobial elimination was directly correlated with convection rate. Current antimicrobial dose recommendations will expose patients to underdosing and increase the risk for treatment failure and development of resistance. Dose recommendations are proposed for some major antibiotic and antifungal treatments in patients receiving at least 25 mL/kg/h CVVH.

Indexed as

antibiotic dosageantibioticscontinuous veno-venous hemofiltrationhigh volume hemofiltrationpharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID32010602
PMCPMC6985915
OpenAlexW3002353219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.