Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32010601›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2019

The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Resection for Gastric Glomus: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Jinlong Hu, Nan Ge, Sheng Wang, Xiang Liu, Jintao Guo, Guoxin Wang, Siyu Sun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prognostic significance of KIF23 expression in gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinlong HuEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Nan GeEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Sheng WangEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Xiang LiuEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Jintao GuoEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Guoxin WangEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Siyu SunEndoscopy Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
China Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPreoperative diagnosis of gastric glomus tumor is very difficult, and there are few reports regarding the endoscopic treatment of glomus tumor of the stomach. Our aim is to provide a retrospective assessment of the imaging features of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and treatment of choice of gastric glomus tumor.

methodsA database of all patients with gastric glomus tumor who was treated at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University between March 2011 and March 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. The EUS characteristics and patients' clinical data as well as their treatment were reviewed. At the same time, we compared EUS characteristics of gastric glomus tumor with that of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GISTs), leiomyomas, schwannomas, and ectopic pancreas.

resultsEleven patients (3 male and 8 female patients) were included in the present study. The patients' age ranged from 37 to 62 years (mean age, 50.1 years). Ten patients received EUS examination. Eight lesions were presented with mild-hyperechoic round or oval mass; one lesion was mild-hyperechoic oval mass with hypoechoic spots; one lesion was hypoechoic oval mass. One patient received endoscopic full-thickness resection; 3 patients were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection; and laparoscopic resection was performed for 7 patients.

conclusionsGastric glomus has typical EUS features to differentiate from other submucosal tumors. Compared with surgery, endoscopic resection is also a safe and effective treatment of choice for gastric glomus tumor.

Indexed as

endoscopic full-thickness resectionendoscopic submucosal dissectionendoscopic ultrasoundglomus tumor

Identifiers

PMID32010601
PMCPMC6985914
OpenAlexW3002396367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.