ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2019
Efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation for diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) vs. Frozen Section in Lung Surgery: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Speed and Accuracy.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- Large Language Models Utility for Rapid On-Site Evaluation in Interventional Pulmonology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of rapid on-site evaluation in subtyping lung cancer via bronchoscopic biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Improved diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary malignant lesions with emphysema using a combination of radial endobronchial ultrasonography and rapid on-site evaluation.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Value of rapid on-site evaluation combined with interventional pulmonology techniques in the diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2024Article
- Diagnostic modalities in the mediastinum and the role of bronchoscopy in mediastinal assessment: a narrative review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Review
- Value of transbronchial needle aspiration combined with a rapid on-site evaluation of cytology in the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- [Expert Consensus on Technical Specifications of Domestic Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy System in Diagnosis, Localization and Treatment (2021 Edition)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2021Article
- Multi-modal tissue sampling in cone beam CT guided navigation bronchoscopy: comparative accuracy of different sampling tools and rapid on-site evaluation of cytopathology.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is gradually becoming an integral part of the modern Interventional Pulmonology, the clinical benefit of ROSE is still a matter of controversy. The objective of this meta-analysis was to clarify whether ROSE is effective in diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes, synchronously, to assess circumstances under which ROSE makes more sense.
methodsMEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies comparing any outcome between ROSE and no-ROSE group in diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes. Statistical calculations were conducted using Review Manager, version 5.3, and Stata Release 12.0. Meta-analysis was completed using a random-effects model when I
resultsThis Literature search yielded 27 studies altogether. The pooled risk difference of adequate rate was 0.12 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.07-0.16, I
conclusionsROSE is a useful technology in diagnosing pulmonary lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes, especially when sampling solid pulmonary lesions or applied to patients with suspected lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.