Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32010396›Full record

ArticleOpen access Macedonian journal of medical sciences2019

Nurses' Perceptions of Patient Safety Culture in Intensive Care Units: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Marwa Salem, John Labib, Ahmed Mahmoud, Silvia Shalaby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marwa SalemKasralainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
John LabibKasralainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed MahmoudKasralainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Silvia ShalabyKasralainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient safety culture is a relatively new focus where little is known about its current status in Egypt's teaching hospitals, mainly intensive care units (ICUs). Therefore, the authors of this study attempted to assess the patient safety culture dimensions from the nurses' perspective.

methodsAn exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted in two ICUs (pediatric ICU and adult ICU) at the University Hospital over 3 months from October till December 2018. Sixty nurses were interviewed using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture.

resultsThe current study findings revealed an average positive response to individual items ranging from 6% to 51%. The "Organizational learning" dimension had the highest average percent positive patient safety dimension score (51%) among all respondents, while the "Frequency of events reported" dimension had the lowest one (6%). No statistically significant difference was reported between the pediatric and adult ICUs for all mean scores except for the "Non-punitive response to error" dimension which was reported to be greater in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) compared to adult ICU (P < 0.005). The overall patient safety grade was rated acceptable by 47.5% of the interviewed nurses.

conclusionThe current study shows that patient safety is fragile in ICUs, and more effort is recommended to increase the awareness of health care providers. Also, hospital managers need to enhance the performance and practices of patient safety within a non-punitive reporting environment.

Indexed as

DimensionsIntensive care unitsNursesPatient safetyPerspectives

Identifiers

PMID32010396
PMCPMC6986516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.